ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2017
Prognostic Impact of Different Histological Types on Gastric Adenocarcinoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database Analysis.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma in a child: A clinical case study.JPGN reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of different lymph node classification systems as independent prognosticators in gastric signet ring cell carcinoma.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinical Features of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Cancer: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2023Review
- The percentages of signet-ring cells (SRCs) affects the prognosis after radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Factors associated with detection of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer on endoscopy in individuals with germline CDH1 mutations.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Article
- Characterization of Poorly Cohesive and Signet Ring Cell Carcinomas and Identification of PTPRM as a Diagnostic Marker.Cancers · 2022Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of poorly cohesive cell subtype of gastric cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2022Article
- A survival comparison of gastric mucin-producing adenocarcinoma to conventional adenocarcinoma: a SEER database analysis.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Prognostic Significance of Signet Ring Cells in Gastric Cancer: The Higher Proportion, The Better Survival.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Analysis of the Factors Affecting Survival in the Patients who Underwent Curative-Intent Gastrectomy due to Gastric Adenocarcinoma.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2021Article
- Adenocarcinoma with Mixed Subtypes in the Early and Advanced Gastric Cancer.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021Article
- Development and validation of prognostic nomogram based on log odds of positive lymph nodes for patients with gastric signet ring cell carcinoma.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Identification of key genes and pathways in gastric signet ring cell carcinoma based on transcriptome analysis.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
- Trends of incidence and survival in patients with gastroenteropancreatic signet ring cell carcinoma: an analysis from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019Article
- MECP2 expression in gastric cancer and its correlation with clinical pathological parameters.Medicine · 2017Article
- Survival predictors associated with signet ring cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SRCCE): A population-based retrospective cohort study.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of gastric mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) are still controversial. We designed our study to evaluate the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of MAC, SRC and ordinary gastric adenocarcinoma (OGAC) by analyzing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-registered database. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with SRC was significantly lower than that of patients with MAC (P = 0.001) and OGAC (P < 0.001), and there was no significant difference in 5-year OS between MAC and OGAC (P = 0.804). Furthermore, there were no significant differences of 5-years OS among these three groups at stage I, II and III (all P > 0.05) and no significant difference between MAC and OGAC at stage IV (P = 0.110). Patients in SRC group had significantly worse survival than those in MAC and OGAC at stage IV (both P = 0.008), with 5-year OS of 3.3%, 5.8%, and 5.8%, respectively. However, the histological type was not found to be an independent prognostic factor of gastric cancer according to the multivariate analysis with Cox regression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28116561What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.