Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28116238›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2017

Multidimensional cognitive evaluation of patients with disorders of consciousness using EEG: A proof of concept study.

Claire Sergent, Frédéric Faugeras, Benjamin Rohaut, Fabien Perrin, Mélanie Valente, Catherine Tallon-Baudry, Laurent Cohen, Lionel Naccache

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06204172 (Intensive Neurowave Emotional Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06204172 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Intensive Neurowave Emotional Stimulation (INES): A Pioneering RCT Investigating Cognitive-Motor Impact in Consciousness Disorders Post Severe Brain Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino PulejoRan2023 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsDisorders of ConsciousnessArmsIntensive Neurowave Emotional Stimulation (INES), Intensive Sensorial Emotional Stimulation (ISES)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Neural Responses to Heartbeats Detect Residual Signs of Consciousness during Resting State in Postcomatose Patients.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Claire SergentLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes et Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR8242, 45 rue des Saints Pères, 75006 Paris, France.
Frédéric FaugerasAP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Department of Neurology, Paris, France; AP-HP, Hôpital Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier, Neurological Unit, Créteil, France; AP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Department of Neurophysiology, Paris, France; INSERM, U 1127, F-75013 Paris, France; Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, PICNIC Lab, F-75013 Paris, France.
Benjamin RohautAP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Department of Neurology, Paris, France; Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, PICNIC Lab, F-75013 Paris, France.
Fabien PerrinAuditory Cognition and Psychoacoustics Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (UCBL, CNRS UMR5292, Inserm U1028), Lyon, France.
Mélanie ValenteInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, PICNIC Lab, F-75013 Paris, France.
Catherine Tallon-BaudryCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-École Normale Supérieure (ENS), Paris, France.
Laurent CohenAP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Department of Neurology, Paris, France; Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, PICNIC Lab, F-75013 Paris, France.
Lionel NaccacheAP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Department of Neurology, Paris, France; Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, PICNIC Lab, F-75013 Paris, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInstitut du Cerveau · FRÉcole Normale Supérieure - PSL · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of cognitive evoked potentials in EEG is now part of the routine evaluation of non-communicating patients with disorders of consciousness in several specialized medical centers around the world. They typically focus on one or two cognitive markers, such as the mismatch negativity or the P3 to global auditory regularity. However it has become clear that none of these markers in isolation is at the same time sufficiently specific and sufficiently sensitive to be taken as the unique gold standard for diagnosing consciousness. A good way forward would be to combine several cognitive markers within the same test to improve evaluation. Furthermore, given the diversity of lesions leading to disorders of consciousness, it is important not only to probe whether a patient is conscious or not, but also to establish a more general and nuanced profile of the residual cognitive capacities of each patient using a combination of markers. In the present study we built a unique EEG protocol that probed 8 dimensions of cognitive processing in a single 1.5 h session. This protocol probed variants of classical markers together with new markers of spatial attention, which has not yet been studied in these patients. The eight dimensions were: (1) own name recognition, (2) temporal attention, (3) spatial attention, (4) detection of spatial incongruence (5) motor planning, and (6,7,8) modulations of these effects by the global context, reflecting higher-level functions. This protocol was tested in 15 healthy control subjects and in 17 patients with various etiologies, among which 13 could be included in the analysis. The results in the control group allowed a validation and a specific description of the cognitive levels probed by each marker. At the single-subject level, this combined protocol allowed assessing the presence of both classical and newly introduced markers for each patient and control, and revealed that the combination of several markers increased diagnostic sensitivity. The presence of a high-level effect in any of the three tested domains distinguished between minimally conscious and vegetative patients, while the presence of low-level effects was similar in both groups. In summary, this study constitutes a validated proof of concept in favor of probing multiple cognitive dimensions to improve the evaluation of non-communicating patients. At a more conceptual level, this EEG tool can help achieve a better understanding of disorders of consciousness by exploring consciousness in its multiple cognitive facets.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionAuditory PerceptionBiomarkersClinical ProtocolsConsciousness DisordersElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMotor ActivityYoung AdultBiomarkersADAN, Anterior Directing Attention NegativityAttentionCNV, contingent negative variationCognitionDisorders of consciousnessDOC, disorders of consciousnessEEGEvent related potentialsLRP, lateralized readiness potentialMCS, minimally conscious stateNon-communicating patientsVS, vegetative state

Identifiers

PMID28116238
PMCPMC5233797
OpenAlexW2560677216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.