ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2017
Impact of Pharmacists' audit on improving the quality of prescription of dabigatran etexilate methanesulfonate: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05086991 (AIHEMAF - P "An Innovative Healthcare Model for AF Patients" No-profit Observational Study on the Role of the Community Pharmacist and "The Pharmacy of Services" in the Case Management of Patients Suffering From Atrial Fibrillation and Being Treated With New Generation Oral Anticoagulants), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
AIHEMAF - P "An Innovative Healthcare Model for AF Patients" No-profit Observational Study on the Role of the Community Pharmacist and "The Pharmacy of Services" in the Case Management of Patients Suffering From Atrial Fibrillation and Being Treated With New Generation Oral Anticoagulants
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of direct oral anticoagulant off-label doses on clinical outcomes of atrial fibrillation patients: A systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- A clinical decision support system promotes the appropriate use of drugs in hospitalized patients with kidney impairment.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2025Review
- AIHEMAF-P: An Innovative Healthcare Model for Atrial Fibrillation Patients.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Development of Quality Indicators to Assess Oral Anticoagulant Management in Community Pharmacies for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAppropriate prescription of dabigatran etexilate methanesulfonate (JAN) is more complicated than assumed, because there are totally 10 items of contraindications and instructions for dosage reduction depending on patients' characteristics. We aimed to study whether the routine audit of first-time prescriptions of dabigatran performed by pharmacists is effective in improving the quality of prescription.
methodsA retrospective re-audit was performed on all the prescriptions of dabigatran issued at Kitahara International Hospital, Tokyo between March 2011 and February 2014, by evaluating the prescriptions rigorously against the approved prescribing information of the drug. The original routine audit of the prescriptions for inpatients was performed by hospital pharmacists using electronic medical records (EMR), whereas the audit for ambulant patients receiving external prescriptions was performed by community pharmacists using information obtained mainly by questioning patients. The frequencies of inappropriate prescriptions detected by the re-audit in the two groups were compared.
resultsTwo hundred and twenty-eight patients (131 ambulant patients and 97 inpatients) were prescribed dabigatran for the first time during the study period. All patients met the approved indications. While 33% of the prescriptions for ambulant patients showed at least one violation of the approved usage, only 11% of the prescriptions for inpatients showed violations (
conclusionThe present study suggests that pharmacists may achieve better performance in auditing prescriptions of dabigatran when medical records are fully available than when information is available mainly by questioning patients. Further large-scale studies are required to clarify whether the audit of dabigatran prescriptions improves ultimate therapeutic outcomes or complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.