Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28116015›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2017

Transition of Care Practices from Emergency Department to Inpatient: Survey Data and Development of Algorithm.

Sangil Lee, Jaime Jordan, H Gene Hern, Chad Kessler, Susan Promes, Sarah Krzyzaniak, Fiona Gallahue, Ted Stettner, Jeffrey Druck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Sangil LeeThe University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.
Jaime JordanHarbor-UCLA Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Torrance, California.
H Gene HernAlameda Health System, Highland Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California.
Chad KesslerDuke University, Department of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Susan PromesPennsylvania State University, Department of Emergency Medicine, State College, Pennsylvania.
Sarah KrzyzaniakUniversity of Illinois at Peoria, Department of Emergency Medicine, Peoria, Illinois.
Fiona GallahueUniversity of Washington, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Ted StettnerEmory University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jeffrey DruckUniversity of Colorado, Department of Emergency Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Harbor–UCLA Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USDuke University · USEmory University · USPennsylvania State University · USPeoria campus of the University of Illinois System · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe aimed to assess the current scope of handoff education and practice among resident physicians in academic centers and to propose a standardized handoff algorithm for the transition of care from the emergency department (ED) to an inpatient setting.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional survey targeted at the program directors, associate or assistant program directors, and faculty members of emergency medicine (EM) residency programs in the United States (U.S.). The web-based survey was distributed to potential subjects through a listserv. A panel of experts used a modified Delphi approach to develop a standardized algorithm for ED to inpatient handoff.

results121 of 172 programs responded to the survey for an overall response rate of 70.3%. Our survey showed that most EM programs in the U.S. have some form of handoff training, and the majority of them occur either during orientation or in the clinical setting. The handoff structure from ED to inpatient is not well standardized, and in those places with a formalized handoff system, over 70% of residents do not uniformly follow it. Approximately half of responding programs felt that their current handoff system was safe and effective. About half of the programs did not formally assess the handoff proficiency of trainees. Handoffs most commonly take place over the phone, though respondents disagree about the ideal place for a handoff to occur, with nearly equivalent responses between programs favoring the bedside over the phone or face-to-face on a computer. Approximately two-thirds of responding programs reported that their residents were competent in performing ED to inpatient handoffs. Based on this survey and on the review of the literature, we developed a five-step algorithm for the transition of care from the ED to the inpatient setting.

conclusionOur results identified the current trends of education and practice in transitions of care, from the ED to the inpatient setting in U.S. academic medical centers. An algorithm, which guides this process, is proposed to address the current gap in the standardized approach to ED to inpatient handoffs that were identified in the survey's assessment of needs.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalHealth PersonnelHumansInpatientsInternship and ResidencyNeeds AssessmentPatient HandoffPatient TransferSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28116015
PMCPMC5226771
OpenAlexW2551418451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.