Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28115722›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Reconciling fisheries catch and ocean productivity.

Charles A Stock, Jasmin G John, Ryan R Rykaczewski, Rebecca G Asch, William W L Cheung, John P Dunne, Kevin D Friedland, Vicky W Y Lam, Jorge L Sarmiento, Reg A Watson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fungal parasites infecting NNature communications · 2026
    Article
  9. Evaluating ecosystem caps on fishery yield in the context of climate stress and predation.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Charles A StockGeophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Princeton, NJ 08540; charles.stock@noaa.gov.
Jasmin G JohnGeophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Princeton, NJ 08540.ORCID 0000-0003-2696-277X
Ryan R RykaczewskiSchool of the Earth, Ocean, and Environment, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208.ORCID 0000-0001-8893-872X
Rebecca G AschAtmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Program, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-0710.
William W L CheungNippon Foundation-Nereus Program, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4.
John P DunneGeophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Princeton, NJ 08540.
Kevin D FriedlandNational Marine Fisheries Service, Narragansett, RI 02882.
Vicky W Y LamNippon Foundation-Nereus Program, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4.
Jorge L SarmientoAtmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Program, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-0710.
Reg A WatsonInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photosynthesis fuels marine food webs, yet differences in fish catch across globally distributed marine ecosystems far exceed differences in net primary production (NPP). We consider the hypothesis that ecosystem-level variations in pelagic and benthic energy flows from phytoplankton to fish, trophic transfer efficiencies, and fishing effort can quantitatively reconcile this contrast in an energetically consistent manner. To test this hypothesis, we enlist global fish catch data that include previously neglected contributions from small-scale fisheries, a synthesis of global fishing effort, and plankton food web energy flux estimates from a prototype high-resolution global earth system model (ESM). After removing a small number of lightly fished ecosystems, stark interregional differences in fish catch per unit area can be explained (

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsClimate ChangeEcosystemFisheriesFishesFood ChainModels, BiologicalOceans and SeasPlanktonclimate changefisheries catchfood websocean productivityprimary production

Identifiers

PMID28115722
PMCPMC5338393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.