ArticleNucleic acids research2017
Ensemble simulations: folding, unfolding and misfolding of a high-efficiency frameshifting RNA pseudoknot.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- -1 Programmed ribosomal frameshifting in Class 2 umbravirus-like RNAs uses multiple long-distance interactions to shift between active and inactive structures and destabilize the frameshift stimulating element.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting from the perspective of the conformational dynamics of mRNA and ribosomes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Effects of the PIWI/MID domain of Argonaute protein on the association of miRNAi's seed base with the target.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- Plasmon Rulers as a Probe for Real-Time Microsecond Conformational Dynamics of Single Molecules.Nano letters · 2018Article
- Monovalent ions modulate the flux through multiple folding pathways of an RNA pseudoknot.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Compactness of viral genomes: effect of disperse and localized random mutations.Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Massive all-atom molecular dynamics simulations were conducted across a distributed computing network to study the folding, unfolding, misfolding and conformational plasticity of the high-efficiency frameshifting double mutant of the 26 nt potato leaf roll virus RNA pseudoknot. Our robust sampling, which included over 40 starting structures spanning the spectrum from the extended unfolded state to the native fold, yielded nearly 120 μs of cumulative sampling time. Conformational microstate transitions on the 1.0 ns to 10.0 μs timescales were observed, with post-equilibration sampling providing detailed representations of the conformational free energy landscape and the complex folding mechanism inherent to the pseudoknot motif. Herein, we identify and characterize two alternative native structures, three intermediate states, and numerous misfolded states, the latter of which have not previously been characterized via atomistic simulation techniques. While in line with previous thermodynamics-based models of a general RNA folding mechanism, our observations indicate that stem-strand-sequence-separation may serve as an alternative predictor of the order of stem formation during pseudoknot folding. Our results contradict a model of frameshifting based on structural rigidity and resistance to mechanical unfolding, and instead strongly support more recent studies in which conformational plasticity is identified as a determining factor in frameshifting efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.