Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28115460›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2017

Screening for frailty in primary care: Accuracy of gait speed and hand-grip strength.

Linda Lee, Tejal Patel, Andrew Costa, Erin Bryce, Loretta M Hillier, Karen Slonim, Susan W Hunter, George Heckman, Frank Molnar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Validity and Reliability of the InGripJournal of Korean medical science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Linda LeeFamily physician with the Centre for Family Medicine Family Health Team (CFFM FHT) in Kitchener, Ont, Schlegel Research Chair in Primary Care for Elders at the Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, and Associate Clinical Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont. lee.linda.lw@gmail.com.
Tejal PatelPharmacist with the CFFM FHT and Assistant Clinical Professor at the University of Waterloo School of Pharmacy.
Andrew CostaSchlegel Research Chair in Clinical Epidemiology and Aging and Assistant Professor in the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the Department of Medicine at McMaster University.
Erin BryceResearch manager with the Department of Health, Aging, and Society at McMaster University.
Loretta M HillierResearch associate with Specialized Geriatric Services at St Joseph's Health Care London and the Aging, Rehabilitation and Geriatric Care Research Centre of the Lawson Health Research Institute in London, Ont.
Karen SlonimResearch associate with the CFFM FHT.
Susan W HunterAssistant Professor in the School of Physical Therapy at Western University in London.
George HeckmanSchlegel Research Chair in Geriatric Medicine, Associate Professor in the Faculty of Applied Health Sciences in the School of Public Health and Health Systems at the University of Waterloo, and Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine at McMaster University.
Frank MolnarGeriatrician in Ottawa, Ont, Medical Director of the Regional Geriatric Program of Eastern Ontario, and Associate Professor in the Department of Medicine at the University of Ottawa.
McMaster University · CAAmerican Pharmacists Association · USCentre for Family Medicine · CAFlora Family Foundation · USIndiana University Health · USLawson Health Research Institute · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the accuracy of individual Fried frailty phenotype measures in identifying the Fried frailty phenotype in primary care.

designRetrospective chart review.

settingA community-based primary care practice in Kitchener, Ont.

participantsA total of 516 patients 75 years of age and older who underwent frailty screening.

main outcome measuresUsing modified Fried frailty phenotype measures, frailty criteria included gait speed, hand-grip strength as measured by a dynamometer, and self-reported exhaustion, low physical activity, and unintended weight loss. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and precision were calculated for single-trait and dual-trait markers.

resultsComplete frailty screening data were available for 383 patients. The overall prevalence of frailty based on the presence of 3 or more frailty criteria was 6.5%. The overall prevalence of individual Fried frailty phenotype markers ranged from 2.1% to 19.6%. The individual criteria all showed sensitivity and specificity of more than 80%, with the exception of weight loss (8.3% and 97.4%, respectively). The positive predictive value of the single-item criteria in predicting the Fried frailty phenotype ranged from 12.5% to 52.5%. When gait speed and hand-grip strength were combined as a dual measure, the positive predictive value increased to 87.5%.

conclusionThere is a need for frailty measures that are psychometrically sound and feasible to administer in primary care. While use of gait speed or grip strength alone was found to be sensitive and specific as a proxy for the Fried frailty phenotype, use of both measures together was found to be accurate, precise, specific, and more sensitive than other possible combinations. Assessing both measures is feasible within primary care.

Indexed as

AgingFrail ElderlyHand StrengthWalking SpeedAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleOntarioPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesSelf ReportSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID28115460
PMCPMC5257239
OpenAlexW2582226733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.