Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28115386›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2017

Formulation of Biocides Increases Antimicrobial Potency and Mitigates the Enrichment of Nonsusceptible Bacteria in Multispecies Biofilms.

Sarah Forbes, Nicola Cowley, Gavin Humphreys, Hitesh Mistry, Alejandro Amézquita, Andrew J McBain

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah ForbesBiomolecular Sciences Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Nicola CowleySchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Gavin HumphreysSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9138-0859
Hitesh MistrySchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Alejandro AmézquitaUnilever, Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire, United Kingdom.
Andrew J McBainSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom andrew.mcbain@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5255-5425
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBSheffield Hallam University · GBUnilever (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current investigation aimed to generate data to inform the development of risk assessments of biocide usage. Stabilized domestic drain biofilm microcosms were exposed daily over 6 months to increasing concentrations (0.01% to 1%) of the biocide benzalkonium chloride (BAC) in a simple aqueous solution (BAC-s) or in a complex formulation (BAC-f) representative of a domestic cleaning agent. Biofilms were analyzed by culture, differentiating by bacterial functional group and by BAC or antibiotic susceptibility. Bacterial isolates were identified by 16S rRNA sequencing, and changes in biofilm composition were assessed by high-throughput sequencing. Exposure to BAC-f resulted in significantly larger reductions in levels of viable bacteria than exposure to BAC-s, while bacterial diversity greatly decreased during exposure to both BAC-s and BAC-f, as evidenced by sequencing and viable counts. Increases in the abundance of bacteria exhibiting reduced antibiotic or BAC susceptibility following exposure to BAC at 0.1% were significantly greater for BAC-s than BAC-f. Bacteria with reduced BAC and antibiotic susceptibility were generally suppressed by higher BAC concentrations, and formulation significantly enhanced this effect. Significant decreases in the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria isolated from the systems before and after long-term BAC exposure were not detected. In summary, dose-dependent suppression of bacterial viability by BAC was enhanced by formulation. Biocide exposure decreased bacterial diversity and transiently enriched populations of organisms with lower antimicrobial susceptibility, and the effects were subsequently suppressed by exposure to 1% BAC-f, the concentration most closely reflecting deployment in formulated products.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBacteriaBenzalkonium CompoundsBiofilmsDisinfectantsDrug Resistance, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityRisk AssessmentRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Infective AgentsBenzalkonium CompoundsDisinfectantsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SantibioticsbiocidesCDFFformulationmicrobicidesresistancesusceptibility

Identifiers

PMID28115386
PMCPMC5359493
OpenAlexW2581544985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.