Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28115299›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2017

Effects on Engagement and Health Literacy Outcomes of Web-Based Materials Promoting Physical Activity in People With Diabetes: An International Randomized Trial.

Ingrid Muller, Alison Rowsell, Beth Stuart, Victoria Hayter, Paul Little, Kristin Ganahl, Gabriele Müller, Gerardine Doyle, Peter Chang, Courtney R Lyles and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Patient enablement and health-related quality of life for patients with chronic back and knee pain: a cross-sectional study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ingrid MullerDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9341-6133
Alison RowsellDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2962-029X
Beth StuartPrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5432-7437
Victoria HayterDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2157-2855
Paul LittlePrimary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3664-1873
Kristin GanahlGesundheit Österreich GmbH (Austrian Public Health Institute), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7322-6754
Gabriele MüllerCentre for Evidence-based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1591-0539
Gerardine DoyleUCD College of Business, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8516-4431
Peter ChangTaipei Medical University and National Taipei Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2675-9483
Courtney R LylesDivision of General Internal Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1111-8595
Don NutbeamSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6497-2827
Lucy YardleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3853-883X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeveloping accessible Web-based materials to support diabetes self-management in people with lower levels of health literacy is a continuing challenge.

objectiveThe objective of this international study was to develop a Web-based intervention promoting physical activity among people with type 2 diabetes to determine whether audiovisual presentation and interactivity (quizzes, planners, tailoring) could help to overcome the digital divide by making digital interventions accessible and effective for people with all levels of health literacy. This study also aimed to determine whether these materials can improve health literacy outcomes for people with lower levels of health literacy and also be effective for people with higher levels of health literacy.

methodsTo assess the impact of interactivity and audiovisual features on usage, engagement, and health literacy outcomes, we designed two versions of a Web-based intervention (one interactive and one plain-text version of the same content) to promote physical activity in people with type 2 diabetes. We randomly assigned participants from the United Kingdom, Austria, Germany, Ireland, and Taiwan to either an interactive or plain-text version of the intervention in English, German, or Mandarin. Intervention usage was objectively recorded by the intervention software. Self-report measures were taken at baseline and follow-up (immediately after participants viewed the intervention) and included measures of health literacy, engagement (website satisfaction and willingness to recommend the intervention to others), and health literacy outcomes (diabetes knowledge, enablement, attitude, perceived behavioral control, and intention to undertake physical activity).

resultsIn total, 1041 people took part in this study. Of the 1005 who completed health literacy information, 268 (26.67%) had intermediate or low levels of health literacy. The interactive intervention overall did not produce better outcomes than did the plain-text version. Participants in the plain-text intervention group looked at significantly more sections of the intervention (mean difference -0.47, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.30, P<.001), but this did not lead to better outcomes. Health literacy outcomes, including attitudes and intentions to engage in physical activity, significantly improved following the intervention for participants in both intervention groups. These improvements were similar across higher and lower health literacy levels and in all countries. Participants in the interactive intervention group had acquired more diabetes knowledge (mean difference 0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.94, P<.001). Participants from both groups reported high levels of website satisfaction and would recommend the website to others.

conclusionsFollowing established practice for simple, clear design and presentation and using a person-based approach to intervention development, with in-depth iterative feedback from users, may be more important than interactivity and audiovisual presentations when developing accessible digital health interventions to improve health literacy outcomes. CLINICALTRIAL: International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 43587048; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN43587048. (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6nGhaP9bv).

Indexed as

InternetDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ExerciseFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf Carediabetesdigital interventionhealth literacyphysical activityquantitative trial

Identifiers

PMID28115299
PMCPMC5294369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.