ArticleStem cell research & therapy2017
Generation of mesenchymal stromal cells from cord blood: evaluation of in vitro quality parameters prior to clinical use.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validated methods for isolation and qualification of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells from different sources.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- The influence of cell source on the senescence of human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells.Human cell · 2025Review
- Isolation and Characterization of Canine Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Considerations in Translation from Laboratory to Clinic.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Chondrogenic Potential of Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Insights and Innovations.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Review
- Multipotent fetal stem cells in reproductive biology research.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Review
- Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Derived from Perinatal Tissues: Sources, Characteristics and Isolation Methods.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2023Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2023Review
- Autologous Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Therapy in Infertility: New Strategies and Future Perspectives.Biology · 2023Review
- Functional enhancement strategies to potentiate the therapeutic properties of mesenchymal stromal cells for respiratory diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Evaluation of a Novel Thiol-Norbornene-Functionalized Gelatin Hydrogel for Bioprinting of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Cell therapy in patients with heart failure: a comprehensive review and emerging concepts.Cardiovascular research · 2022Review
- Optimization of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell isolation and culture methods in serum- and xeno-free conditions.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Article
- Possible Effect of the use of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in the Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- The role of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for ischemic stroke and recent research developments.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- Review
- Overcome the barriers of the skin: exosome therapy.Biomaterials research · 2021Review
- Strategies to Potentiate Paracrine Therapeutic Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Inflammatory Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Review
- A flow cytometric assay for the quantification of MSC lysis by peripheral blood mononucleated cells.Heliyon · 2021Article
- The therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cells on experimental colitis was improved by the IFN-γ and poly(I:C) priming through promoting the expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncreasing evidence suggests the safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) as advanced therapy medicinal products because of their immunomodulatory properties and supportive role in hematopoiesis. Although bone marrow remains the most common source for obtaining off-the-shelf MSC, cord blood (CB) represents an alternative source, which can be collected noninvasively and without major ethical concerns. However, the low estimated frequency and inconsistency of successful isolation represent open challenges for the use of CB-derived MSC in clinical trials. This study explores whether CB may represent a suitable source of MSC for clinical use and analyzes several in vitro parameters useful to better define the quality of CB-derived MSC prior to clinical application.
methodsCB units (n = 50) selected according to quality criteria (CB volume ≥ 20 ml, time from collection ≤ 24 h) were cultured using a standardized procedure for CB-MSC generation. MSC were analyzed for their growth potential and secondary colony-forming capacity. Immunophenotype and multilineage differentiation potential of culture-expanded CB-MSC were assessed to verify MSC identity. The immunomodulatory activity at resting conditions and after inflammatory priming (IFN-γ-1b and TNF-α for 48 hours) was explored to assess the in vitro potency of CB-MSC prior to clinical application. Molecular karyotyping was used to assess the genetic stability after prolonged MSC expansion.
resultsWe were able to isolate MSC colonies from 44% of the processed units. Our results do not support a role of CB volume in determining the outcome of the cultures, in terms of both isolation and proliferative capacity of CB-MSC. Particularly, we have confirmed the existence of two different CB-MSC populations named short- and long-living (SL- and LL-) CBMSC, clearly diverging in their growth capacity and secondary colony-forming efficiency. Only LL-CBMSC were able to expand consistently and to survive for longer periods in vitro, while preserving genetic stability. Therefore, they may represent interesting candidates for therapeutic applications. We have also observed that LL-CBMSC were not equally immunosuppressive, particularly after inflammatory priming and despite upregulating priming-inducible markers.
conclusionsThis work supports the use of CB as a potential MSC source for clinical applications, remaining more readily available compared to conventional sources. We have provided evidence that not all LL-CBMSC are equally immunosuppressive in an inflammatory environment, suggesting the need to include the assessment of potency among the release criteria for each CB-MSC batch intended for clinical use, at least for the treatment of immune disorders as GvHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.