Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28114940›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

The role of organizational context in moderating the effect of research use on pain outcomes in hospitalized children: a cross sectional study.

Janet Yamada, Janet E Squires, Carole A Estabrooks, Charles Victor, Bonnie Stevens, CIHR Team in Children’s Pain

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. [Application of the Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality method in neonatal intensive care units].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janet YamadaDaphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Janet E SquiresFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Carole A EstabrooksFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Charles VictorUniversity of Toronto, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Bonnie StevensLawrence S Bloomberg, Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Ottawa, ON, Canada. bonnie.stevens@sickkids.ca.
CIHR Team in Children’s Pain

Funding

CIHR CTP-79854CIHR MOP-86605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite substantial research on pediatric pain assessment and management, health care professionals do not adequately incorporate this knowledge into clinical practice. Organizational context (work environment) is a significant factor in influencing outcomes; however, the nature of the mechanisms are relatively unknown. The objective of this study was to assess how organizational context moderates the effect of research use and pain outcomes in hospitalized children.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was undertaken with 779 nurses in 32 patient care units in 8 Canadian pediatric hospitals, following implementation of a multifaceted knowledge translation intervention, Evidence-based Practice for Improving Quality (EPIQ). The influence of organizational context was assessed in relation to pain process (assessment and management) and clinical (pain intensity) outcomes. Organizational context was measured using the Alberta Context Tool that includes: leadership, culture, evaluation, social capital, informal interactions, formal interactions, structural and electronic resources, and organizational slack (staff, space, and time). Marginal modeling estimated the effects of instrumental research use (direct use of research knowledge) and conceptual research use (indirect use of research knowledge) on pain outcomes while examining the effects of context.

resultsSix of the 10 organizational context factors (culture, social capital, informal interactions, resources, and organizational slack [space and time]) significantly moderated the effect of instrumental research use on pain assessment; four factors (culture, social capital, resources and organizational slack time) moderated the effect of conceptual research use and pain assessment. Only two factors (evaluation and formal interactions) moderated the effect of instrumental research use on pain management. All organizational factors except slack space significantly moderated the effect of instrumental research use on pain intensity; informal interactions and organizational slack space moderated the effect of conceptual research use and pain intensity.

conclusionsMany aspects of organizational context consistently moderated the effects of instrumental research use on pain assessment and pain intensity, while only a few influenced conceptual use of research on pain outcomes. Organizational context factors did not generally influence the effect of research use on pain management. Further research is required to further explore the relationships between organizational context and pain management outcomes.

Indexed as

Child, HospitalizedHospitals, PediatricAdultBiomedical ResearchCanadaChecklistChildCross-Sectional StudiesEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursesPainPain Managementchildrencultureevaluationknowledge translationleadershiporganizational contextpainwork environment

Identifiers

PMID28114940
PMCPMC5259896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.