Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28114931›Full record

ReviewBMC medicine2017

Procalcitonin-guided diagnosis and antibiotic stewardship revisited.

Ramon Sager, Alexander Kutz, Beat Mueller, Philipp Schuetz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ramon SagerUniversity Department of Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, CH-5001, Aarau, Switzerland.
Alexander KutzUniversity Department of Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, CH-5001, Aarau, Switzerland.
Beat MuellerUniversity Department of Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, CH-5001, Aarau, Switzerland.
Philipp SchuetzUniversity Department of Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, CH-5001, Aarau, Switzerland. schuetzph@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6400-4949

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several controlled clinical studies have evaluated the potential of the infection biomarker procalcitonin (PCT) to improve the diagnostic work-up of patients with bacterial infections and its influence on decisions regarding antibiotic therapy. Most research has focused on lower respiratory tract infections and critically ill sepsis patients. A clinical utility for PCT has also been found for patients with urinary tract infections, postoperative infections, meningitis, and patients with acute heart failure with possible superinfection (i.e., pneumonia). In these indications, PCT levels measured on hospital admission were found to substantially reduce the initiation of antibiotic treatment in low-risk situations (i.e., bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation). For more severe infections (i.e., pneumonia, sepsis), antibiotic stewardship by monitoring of PCT kinetics resulted in shorter antibiotic treatment durations with early cessation of therapy. Importantly, these strategies appear to be safe without increasing the risk for mortality, recurrent infections, or treatment failures. PCT kinetics also proved to have prognostic value correlating with disease severity (i.e., pancreatitis, abdominal infection) and resolution of illness (i.e., sepsis). Although promising findings have been published in these different types of infections, there are a number of limitations regarding PCT, including suboptimal sensitivity and/or specificity, which makes a careful interpretation of PCT in the clinical context mandatory. This narrative review aims to update clinicians on the strengths and limitations of PCT for patient management, focusing on research conducted within the last 4 years.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsBiomarkersCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideHumansProtein PrecursorsTreatment FailureAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideProtein PrecursorsAntibiotic stewardshipPneumoniaProcalcitoninRespiratory tract infectionSepsis

Identifiers

PMID28114931
PMCPMC5259962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.