Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28114880›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of STD & AIDS2017

Factors associated with patients who prefer HIV self-testing over health professional testing in an emergency department-based rapid HIV screening program.

Yu-Hsiang Hsieh, Kaylin J Beck, Richard E Rothman, Megan Gauvey-Kern, Alonzo Woodfield, Stephen Peterson, Danielle Signer, Charlotte A Gaydos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of STD & AIDS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Acceptability and uptake of HIV self-testing in emergency care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The Role of Health Kiosks: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022
    Article
  5. Performance evaluation and acceptability of point-of-careInternational journal of STD & AIDS · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yu-Hsiang Hsieh1 Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kaylin J Beck1 Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Richard E Rothman1 Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Megan Gauvey-Kern1 Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alonzo Woodfield1 Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Stephen Peterson1 Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Danielle Signer1 Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Charlotte A Gaydos1 Department of Emergency Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

TrainingU54EB007958 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Yukari C Manabe · 2007 to 2026
$34.6M
Cost-Effectiveness of ED HIV Testing Program Agent-Based Modeling ApproachK01AI100681 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HSIEH, YU-HSIANG · 2012 to 2015
$532k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI100681NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB007958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kiosk-facilitated HIV self-testing has been shown to be accurate and well accepted by emergency department (ED) patients. We investigated factors associated with patients who preferred self-testing over testing performed by health professionals in an ED-based HIV screening program. This opt-in program evaluation studied 332 patients in an inner-city academic ED from February 2012 to April 2012, when a kiosk-based HIV self-testing program was standard of care. The first kiosk in the 2-stage system registered patients and assessed their interest in screening, while the second kiosk gathered demographic and risk factor information and also provided self-testing instructions. Patients who declined to self-test were offered testing by staff. Broad eligibility included patients aged 18-64 years who were not critically ill, English-speaking, able to provide informed consent, and registered during HIV program operational hours. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis and Chi squared tests; 160 (48.2%) of 332 patients consenting to testing chose to use a kiosk to guide them performing self-testing. Patients aged 25-29 years and those whose primary ED diagnosis was not infectious disease-related were more likely to prefer HIV self-testing (OR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.17-4.10; OR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.03-3.12). HIV self-testing in the ED could serve as a complementary testing approach to the conventional modality.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPatient PreferenceAdolescentAdultBaltimoreFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareTime FactorsEmergency departmentHIVscreeningself-testing

Identifiers

PMID28114880
PMCPMC5494004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.