Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28114849›Full record

Trial reportStress (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2017

Better executive function under stress mitigates the effects of recent life stress exposure on health in young adults.

Grant S Shields, Wesley G Moons, George M Slavich

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stress (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Insidious Influence of Stress: An Integrated Model of Stress, Executive Control, and Psychopathology.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  15. Why is subjective stress severity a stronger predictor of health than stressor exposure? A preregistered two-study test of two hypotheses.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2023
    Article
  16. FMR1 CGG Repeats and Stress Influence Self-Reported Cognitive Functioning in Mothers.American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Grant S Shieldsa Department of Psychology , University of California , Davis , CA , USA.
Wesley G Moonsb Moons Analytics , San Diego , CA , USA.
George M Slavichc Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences , University of California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Neural, Inflammatory, and Genomic Mechanisms Underlying Risk for Depression in AdolescenceK08MH103443 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SLAVICH, GEORGE MICHAEL · 2015 to 2018
$772k
NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH103443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Executive function is a neuropsychological construct that enables controlled cognitive processing, which has been hypothesized to enhance individuals' resilience to stress. However, little empirical work has directly examined how executive function under different conditions mitigates the negative effects of stress exposure on health. To address this issue, we recruited 110 healthy young adults and assessed their recent life stress exposure, executive function in either a stressful or non-stressful context, and current health complaints. Based on existing research, we hypothesized that individuals exhibiting better executive function following a laboratory-based stressor (but not a control task) would demonstrate weaker associations between recent stress exposure and health because they perceived recent life stressors as being less severe. Consistent with this hypothesis, better executive function during acute stress, but not in the absence of stress, was associated with an attenuated link between participants' recent life stress exposure and their current health complaints. Moreover, this attenuating effect was mediated by lesser perceptions of stressor severity. Based on these data, we conclude that better executive function under stress is associated with fewer health complaints and that these effects may occur by reducing individuals' perceptions of stressor severity. The data thus suggest the possibility of reducing stress-related health problems by enhancing executive function.

Indexed as

AdolescentExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsPerceptionStress, PsychologicalYoung Adultcognitive flexibilityCumulative life stressdiseaseexecutive functionhealthmediated moderationresilienceriskSTRAINstress perception

Identifiers

PMID28114849
PMCPMC5517019
OpenAlexW2582416915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.