Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28114727›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2017

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain in women with endometriosis.

Julie Brown, Tineke J Crawford, Claire Allen, Sally Hopewell, Andrew Prentice

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06611501 (Glycemic Regulation as Endometriosis Adjunct Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 82 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06611501 phase2active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Glycemic Regulation as Endometriosis Adjunct Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston Children's HospitalRan2025 to 2027Enrolled14ConditionsPelvic Pain, EndometriosisArmsMetformin Hydrochloride, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 299 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Risk of congenital anomalies among infants of patients with endometriosis: a population-based cohort study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  14. Management of Gynaecological Chronic Pelvic Pain in the Emergency Setting- A Scoping Review.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Scoping Systematic Review of Cannabis Use in Endometriosis.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Julie BrownLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand, 1142.
Tineke J CrawfordLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand, 1142.
Claire AllenEvidence Aid, 1st Floor, Gibson Building (c/o CEBM), Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK, OX2 6GG.
Sally HopewellOxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Windmill Road, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK, OX3 7LD.
Andrew PrenticeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rosie Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK, CB2 2SW.
University of Auckland · NZUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis is a common gynaecological condition that affects women and can lead to painful symptoms and infertility. It greatly affects women's quality of life, impacting their careers, everyday activities, sexual and nonsexual relationships and fertility. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are most commonly used as first-line treatment for women with pain associated with endometriosis.

objectivesTo assess effects of NSAIDs used for management of pain in women with endometriosis compared with placebo, other NSAIDs, other pain management drugs or no treatment. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register of Controlled Trials (October 2016), published in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, as well as MEDLINE (January 2008 to October 2016), Embase (date limited from 1 January 2016 to 19 October 2016, as all earlier references are included in CENTRAL output as a result of the Embase project), registers of ongoing trials and the reference lists of relevant publications. We identified no new randomised controlled trials. Unless we identify new evidence in the future, we will not update this review. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) describing use of NSAIDs for management of pain associated with endometriosis in women of all ages. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: In the 2009 update of this review, two review authors (CA and SH) independently read and extracted data from each of the included studies. We analysed cross-over trials using the inverse variance method of RevMan to calculate odds ratios for binary outcomes. MAIN

resultsWe identified no new trials for the 2016 update. This review includes two trials, but we included only one trial, with 24 women, in the analysis.The overall risk of bias was unclear owing to lack of methodological detail. Using the GRADE method, we judged the quality of the evidence to be very low. We downgraded evidence for risk of bias and for imprecision (wide confidence intervals and evidence based on a single small trial).Comparison of NSAIDs (naproxen) versus placebo revealed no evidence of a positive effect on pain relief (odds ratio (OR) 3.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61 to 17.69; one trial, 24 women; very low-quality evidence) in women with endometriosis. Evidence indicating whether women taking NSAIDs (naproxen) were less likely to require additional analgesia (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.29; one trial, 24 women; very low-quality evidence) or to experience side effects (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.47; one trial, 24 women; very low-quality evidence) when compared with placebo was inconclusive.Studies provided no data on quality of life, effects on daily activities, absence from work or school, need for more invasive treatment or participant satisfaction with treatment. AUTHORS'

conclusionsOwing to lack of high-quality evidence and lack of reporting of outcomes of interest for this review, we can make no judgement as to whether NSAIDs (naproxen) are effective in managing pain caused by endometriosis. No evidence shows whether any individual NSAID is more effective than another. As shown in other Cochrane reviews, women taking NSAIDs must be aware that these drugs may cause unintended effects.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalEndometriosisFemaleHumansPainAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

PMID28114727
PMCPMC6464974
OpenAlexW1949590937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.