ArticleJAMA2017
Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department.
Article in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 312 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Validation of the SEPSIS-3 Criterion for Sepsis and Septic Shock in the Emergency Department
Evaluation of the Performance of Sepsis Predictive Scores on the Elderly Population in the Emergency Department.
Who cites it
312 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of procalcitonin and presepsin in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Age-adjusted quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for predicting mortality and disease severity in children with infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Risk stratification scores for patients with acute heart failure in the Emergency Department: A systematic review.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2020Pooled it
- Effect of the 1-h bundle on mortality in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department: a stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial.Intensive care medicine · 2024Trial
- Quick sequential organ failure assessment versus systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for emergency department patients with suspected infection.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Article
- Discrimination performance of the Phoenix sepsis score versus pediatric sequential organ failure assessment for predicting in-hospital mortality in critically ill children: a multicenter external validation study.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Outcomes of Thrombocytopenia at ICU Admission Among Critically Ill Patients in a Resource-Limited Setting.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Prevalence and clinical implications of altered mental status in patients with infection presenting to the emergency department.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Immunosuppression, resistance burden, and qSOFA on short-term prognosis and difficult clearance in hospitalized patients with Salmonella infection: a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- The new SOFA for sepsis identification and mortality prediction: a multicenter cohort study.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and quick SOFA(qSOFA) predict 30-day mortality in patients with HIV-associated Talaromycosis: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Diagnosing Sepsis in Primary Care: Navigating Clinical Uncertainty Across Vulnerable Patient Groups.Cureus · 2026Review
- Article
- Exploring Associations Between Early Cognitive Impairment and Echocardiographic Markers in Middle-Aged Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Cardiometabolic Comorbidities: A Pilot Study.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven cluster analysis for identifying clinical phenotypes in suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Challenges in early detection and prognostication of sepsis: new approaches from the emergency department and intensive care unit.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Integrating serum ferritin and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score improves mortality prediction in sepsis.World journal of methodology · 2026Article
252 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: An international task force recently redefined the concept of sepsis. This task force recommended the use of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score instead of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria to identify patients at high risk of mortality. However, these new criteria have not been prospectively validated in some settings, and their added value in the emergency department remains unknown. Objective: To prospectively validate qSOFA as a mortality predictor and compare the performances of the new sepsis criteria to the previous ones. Design, Settings, and Participants: International prospective cohort study, conducted in France, Spain, Belgium, and Switzerland between May and June 2016. In the 30 participating emergency departments, for a 4-week period, consecutive patients who visited the emergency departments with suspected infection were included. All variables from previous and new definitions of sepsis were collected. Patients were followed up until hospital discharge or death. Exposures: Measurement of qSOFA, SOFA, and SIRS. Main Outcomes and Measures: In-hospital mortality. Results: Of 1088 patients screened, 879 were included in the analysis. Median age was 67 years (interquartile range, 47-81 years), 414 (47%) were women, and 379 (43%) had respiratory tract infection. Overall in-hospital mortality was 8%: 3% for patients with a qSOFA score lower than 2 vs 24% for those with qSOFA score of 2 or higher (absolute difference, 21%; 95% CI, 15%-26%). The qSOFA performed better than both SIRS and severe sepsis in predicting in-hospital mortality, with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.74-0.85) vs 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59-0.70) for both SIRS and severe sepsis (P < .001; incremental AUROC, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.09-0.22). The hazard ratio of qSOFA score for death was 6.2 (95% CI, 3.8-10.3) vs 3.5 (95% CI, 2.2-5.5) for severe sepsis. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected infection, the use of qSOFA resulted in greater prognostic accuracy for in-hospital mortality than did either SIRS or severe sepsis. These findings provide support for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) criteria in the emergency department setting. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02738164.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28114554What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.