qSOFA for Identifying Sepsis Among Patients With Infection.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Dual-score framework: National Early Warning Score 2 and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores in acute pyelonephritis.World journal of nephrology · 2026
   Article
2. Assessment of soluble thrombomodulin and soluble endoglin as endothelial dysfunction biomarkers in seriously ill surgical septic patients: correlation with organ dysfunction and disease severity.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
   Article
3. Comparing In-Hospital Mortality Prediction by Senior Emergency Resident's Judgment and Prognostic Models in the Emergency Department.BioMed research international · 2023
   Article
4. Clinical and microbiological characterization of sepsis and evaluation of sepsis scores.PloS one · 2021
   Observational
5. Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility Compared Among Different Sepsis Scoring Systems in Adult Patients With Sepsis in Thailand: A Prospective Cohort Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2021
   Article
6. SOFA and qSOFA usefulness for in-hospital death prediction of elderly patients admitted for suspected infection in internal medicine.Infection · 2020
   Article
7. Prognostic accuracy of SIRS criteria and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among influenza patients in the emergency department.BMC infectious diseases · 2020
   Article
8. [Expert systems-urgently needed for early diagnosis of sepsis : Results of retrospective clinical validation of the expert system FLORIDA].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019
   Article
9. Prospective Observational Study Comparing Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 Definitions in Predicting Mortality in Critically Ill Patients.Open forum infectious diseases · 2019
   Article
10. Sepsis: evolving concepts and challenges.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2019
    Review
11. Contribution of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Combined with Electrocardiography in Risk Stratification of Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Chinese medical journal · 2018
    Article
12. Changing Definitions of Sepsis.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2017
    Review
13. An electronic warning system helps reduce the time to diagnosis of sepsis.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva
    Observational

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).2016
• Comment on
  Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.2017
• Comment on
  Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department.2017

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as