ArticleJAMA surgery2017
Surgical Management of Adolescents and Young Adults With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A US Population-Based Analysis.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential placebo bias in current trials of delirium prevention: a network meta-analysis of 86 randomized controlled trials.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Pooled it
- Precision therapeutic strategies for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients With Metastatic Succinate Dehydrogenase-Deficient Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Characteristics and therapeutic strategies for familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Survival trends of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in real-world settings: a population-based retrospective study.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2025Article
- Management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor and acute appendicitis during pregnancy: A case report.Case reports in women's health · 2024Article
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) in Pediatric Patients: A Case Report and Literature Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effects of surgical management for gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients with liver metastasis on survival outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, molecular-genetic and risk profiles of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a cohort of Sudanese patients.African health sciences · 2023Article
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: New Insights for a Multimodal Approach.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2022Review
- Review
- Patient demographics, clinicopathologic features, and outcomes in wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a national cohort analysis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Might Patients with Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Benefit from Operative Management? A Population-Based Retrospective Study.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours (GIST) in Young Adult (18-40 Years) Patients: A Report from the Dutch GIST Registry.Cancers · 2020Article
- Current management of succinate dehydrogenase-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2019Review
- Association of Delirium Response and Safety of Pharmacological Interventions for the Management and Prevention of Delirium: A Network Meta-analysis.JAMA psychiatry · 2019Article
- A NovelJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2018Article
- Current treatment strategies in pediatric gastrointestinal stromal cell tumor.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018Review
- SSAT State-of-the-Art Conference: Current Surgical Management of Gastric Tumors.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: There is a dearth of population-based evidence regarding outcomes of the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Objectives: To describe a large cohort of AYA patients with GISTs and investigate the effect of surgery on GIST-specific survival (GSS) and overall survival (OS). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study of 392 AYA patients and 5373 older adult (OA) patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database with GISTs histologically diagnosed from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2013, with follow-up through December 31, 2015, compared the baseline characteristics of AYA (13-39 years old) and OA (≥40 years old) patients and among AYA patients stratified by operative management. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for OS analyses. Cumulative incidence functions were used for GSS analysis. The effect of surgery on survival was evaluated with a multivariable Fine-Gray regression model. Exposure: Tumor resection. Main Outcomes and Measures: GIST-specific survival and OS. Results: This study included 392 AYA and 5373 OA patients diagnosed with GISTs (207 [52.8%] male AYA patients, 2767 [51.5%] male OA patients, 277 [70.7%] white AYA patients, and 3661 [68.1%] white OA patients). Compared with the OA patients, more AYA patients had small-intestine GISTs (139 [35.5%] vs 1465 [27.3%], P = .008) and were managed operatively (332 [84.7%] vs 4212 [78.4%], P = .003). Multivariable analysis of AYA patients found that nonoperative management was associated with a more than 2-fold increased risk of death from GISTs (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.21-2.25; P = .01). On subset analysis of 349 AYA patients with tumors of the stomach and small intestine, small-intestine location was associated with improved survival (OS: 91.1% vs 77.2%, P = .01; GSS: 91.8% vs 78.0%, P = .008). On subset analysis of 91 AYA patients with metastatic disease, operative management was associated with improved survival (OS: 69.5% vs 53.7%, P = .04; GSS: 71.5% vs 56.7%, P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that AYA patients are more likely to undergo surgical management than OA patients. Operative management is associated with improved OS and GSS in AYA patients, including those with metastatic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.