ArticlePLoS biology2017
Widespread Genetic Incompatibilities between First-Step Mutations during Parallel Adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to a Common Environment.
Article in PLoS biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed.
- Historical contingency limits adaptive diversification in a spatially structured environment.Evolution letters · 2026Article
- The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation revisited.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2025Review
- Reproductive Isolation due to Divergent Ecological Selection Is Accompanied by Vast Genomic Instability in Experimentally Evolved Yeast Populations.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Ecological and Mutation-Order Speciation in Senecio.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Repeatability of evolution and genomic predictions of temperature adaptation in seed beetles.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- Salicylic acid-induced upregulation of AtAACT and AtMVD expression enhances triterpene biosynthesis in Athelia termitophila.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Distinguishing among evolutionary and ecological processes shaping microbiome dynamics.The ISME journal · 2025Review
- Hybrid adaptation is hampered by Haldane's sieve.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Highly parallelized laboratory evolution of wine yeasts for enhanced metabolic phenotypes.Molecular systems biology · 2024Article
- Patterns of Fitness and Gene Expression Epistasis Generated by Beneficial Mutations in the rho and rpoB Genes of Escherichia coli during High-Temperature Adaptation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- The Ecology of Hybrid Incompatibilities.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- Reproductive isolation arises during laboratory adaptation to a novel hot environment.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Trade-offs, trade-ups, and high mutational parallelism underlie microbial adaptation during extreme cycles of feast and famine.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- Mechanistic causes of sign epistasis and its applications.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Article
- Cross-feeding affects the target of resistance evolution to an antifungal drug.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Epistasis decreases with increasing antibiotic pressure but not temperature.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Enforcement of Postzygotic Species Boundaries in the Fungal Kingdom.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022Review
- Experimental andACS infectious diseases · 2022Article
- The diverse effects of phenotypic dominance on hybrid fitness.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Independently evolving populations may adapt to similar selection pressures via different genetic changes. The interactions between such changes, such as in a hybrid individual, can inform us about what course adaptation may follow and allow us to determine whether gene flow would be facilitated or hampered following secondary contact. We used Saccharomyces cerevisiae to measure the genetic interactions between first-step mutations that independently evolved in the same biosynthetic pathway following exposure to the fungicide nystatin. We found that genetic interactions are prevalent and predominantly negative, with the majority of mutations causing lower growth when combined in a double mutant than when alone as a single mutant (sign epistasis). The prevalence of sign epistasis is surprising given the small number of mutations tested and runs counter to expectations for mutations arising in a single biosynthetic pathway in the face of a simple selective pressure. Furthermore, in one third of pairwise interactions, the double mutant grew less well than either single mutant (reciprocal sign epistasis). The observation of reciprocal sign epistasis among these first adaptive mutations arising in the same genetic background indicates that partial postzygotic reproductive isolation could evolve rapidly between populations under similar selective pressures, even with only a single genetic change in each. The nature of the epistatic relationships was sensitive, however, to the level of drug stress in the assay conditions, as many double mutants became fitter than the single mutants at higher concentrations of nystatin. We discuss the implications of these results both for our understanding of epistatic interactions among beneficial mutations in the same biochemical pathway and for speciation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.