Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28114353›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2017

Computational Account of Spontaneous Activity as a Signature of Predictive Coding.

Veronika Koren, Sophie Denève

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Categorization is 'baked' into the brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Design principles for cost functions in optimal sensory coding.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Establishing brain states in neuroimaging data.PLoS computational biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Computational methods to study information processing in neural circuits.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Poisson balanced spiking networks.PLoS computational biology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Causes and consequences of representational drift.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. The power of predictions: An emerging paradigm for psychological research.Current directions in psychological science · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Veronika KorenGroup for Neural Theory, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.
Sophie DenèveGroup for Neural Theory, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9318-9636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous activity is commonly observed in a variety of cortical states. Experimental evidence suggested that neural assemblies undergo slow oscillations with Up ad Down states even when the network is isolated from the rest of the brain. Here we show that these spontaneous events can be generated by the recurrent connections within the network and understood as signatures of neural circuits that are correcting their internal representation. A noiseless spiking neural network can represent its input signals most accurately when excitatory and inhibitory currents are as strong and as tightly balanced as possible. However, in the presence of realistic neural noise and synaptic delays, this may result in prohibitively large spike counts. An optimal working regime can be found by considering terms that control firing rates in the objective function from which the network is derived and then minimizing simultaneously the coding error and the cost of neural activity. In biological terms, this is equivalent to tuning neural thresholds and after-spike hyperpolarization. In suboptimal working regimes, we observe spontaneous activity even in the absence of feed-forward inputs. In an all-to-all randomly connected network, the entire population is involved in Up states. In spatially organized networks with local connectivity, Up states spread through local connections between neurons of similar selectivity and take the form of a traveling wave. Up states are observed for a wide range of parameters and have similar statistical properties in both active and quiescent state. In the optimal working regime, Up states are vanishing, leaving place to asynchronous activity, suggesting that this working regime is a signature of maximally efficient coding. Although they result in a massive increase in the firing activity, the read-out of spontaneous Up states is in fact orthogonal to the stimulus representation, therefore interfering minimally with the network function.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsBiological ClocksBrainBrain WavesComputer SimulationFeedback, PhysiologicalHumansModels, StatisticalNerve NetOscillometry

Identifiers

PMID28114353
PMCPMC5293286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.