ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
Computational Account of Spontaneous Activity as a Signature of Predictive Coding.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Categorization is 'baked' into the brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
- Design principles for cost functions in optimal sensory coding.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Review
- Article
- Efficient coding in biophysically realistic excitatory-inhibitory spiking networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Orthogonalization of spontaneous and stimulus-driven activity by hierarchical neocortical areal network in primates.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Spiking networks that efficiently process dynamic sensory features explain receptor information mixing in somatosensory cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Establishing brain states in neuroimaging data.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Microstimulation of sensory cortex engages natural sensory representations.Current biology : CB · 2023Article
- Computational methods to study information processing in neural circuits.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- The habenula clock influences response to a stressor.Neurobiology of stress · 2021Article
- Uncovering structured responses of neural populations recorded from macaque monkeys with linear support vector machines.STAR protocols · 2021Article
- Predictive learning as a network mechanism for extracting low-dimensional latent space representations.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Poisson balanced spiking networks.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Intrinsic Functional Connectivity is Organized as Three Interdependent Gradients.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- A deep learning framework for neuroscience.Nature neuroscience · 2019Review
- Causes and consequences of representational drift.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2019Review
- Temporal-specific complexity of spiking patterns in spontaneous activity induced by a dual complex network structure.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The power of predictions: An emerging paradigm for psychological research.Current directions in psychological science · 2019Article
- Reading-out task variables as a low-dimensional reconstruction of neural spike trains in single trials.PloS one · 2019Article
- Synaptic E-I Balance Underlies Efficient Neural Coding.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous activity is commonly observed in a variety of cortical states. Experimental evidence suggested that neural assemblies undergo slow oscillations with Up ad Down states even when the network is isolated from the rest of the brain. Here we show that these spontaneous events can be generated by the recurrent connections within the network and understood as signatures of neural circuits that are correcting their internal representation. A noiseless spiking neural network can represent its input signals most accurately when excitatory and inhibitory currents are as strong and as tightly balanced as possible. However, in the presence of realistic neural noise and synaptic delays, this may result in prohibitively large spike counts. An optimal working regime can be found by considering terms that control firing rates in the objective function from which the network is derived and then minimizing simultaneously the coding error and the cost of neural activity. In biological terms, this is equivalent to tuning neural thresholds and after-spike hyperpolarization. In suboptimal working regimes, we observe spontaneous activity even in the absence of feed-forward inputs. In an all-to-all randomly connected network, the entire population is involved in Up states. In spatially organized networks with local connectivity, Up states spread through local connections between neurons of similar selectivity and take the form of a traveling wave. Up states are observed for a wide range of parameters and have similar statistical properties in both active and quiescent state. In the optimal working regime, Up states are vanishing, leaving place to asynchronous activity, suggesting that this working regime is a signature of maximally efficient coding. Although they result in a massive increase in the firing activity, the read-out of spontaneous Up states is in fact orthogonal to the stimulus representation, therefore interfering minimally with the network function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.