ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
Scalable Parameter Estimation for Genome-Scale Biochemical Reaction Networks.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guidelines for benchmarking of optimization-based approaches for fitting mathematical models.Genome biology · 2019Guideline
- Systems biology during 20 years of PLoS Computational Biology.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Decoding cellular population dynamics through mechanistic modelling and statistical data analysis.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Review
- Parameterization of cell-free systems with time-series data using KETCHUP.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Learning stochastic processes with intrinsic noise from cross-sectional biological data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- PEtab.jl: advancing the efficiency and utility of dynamic modelling.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- The Constrained Disorder Principle Overcomes the Challenges of Methods for Assessing Uncertainty in Biological Systems.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Mathematical basis and toolchain for hierarchical optimization of biochemical networks.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- A comprehensive review of computational cell cycle models in guiding cancer treatment strategies.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Review
- Efficient parameter estimation for ODE models of cellular processes using semi-quantitative data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Article
- Benchmarking methods for computing local sensitivities in ordinary differential equation models at dynamic and steady states.PloS one · 2024Article
- Parameter Estimation for Kinetic Models of Chemical Reaction Networks from Partial Experimental Data of Species' Concentrations.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Predicting anti-cancer drug combination responses with a temporal cell state network model.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Mechanistic model of MAPK signaling reveals how allostery and rewiring contribute to drug resistance.Molecular systems biology · 2023Article
- A quantitative model for human neurovascular coupling with translated mechanisms from animals.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Efficient computation of adjoint sensitivities at steady-state in ODE models of biochemical reaction networks.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Mechanistic model for human brain metabolism and its connection to the neurovascular coupling.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Fides: Reliable trust-region optimization for parameter estimation of ordinary differential equation models.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanistic mathematical modeling of biochemical reaction networks using ordinary differential equation (ODE) models has improved our understanding of small- and medium-scale biological processes. While the same should in principle hold for large- and genome-scale processes, the computational methods for the analysis of ODE models which describe hundreds or thousands of biochemical species and reactions are missing so far. While individual simulations are feasible, the inference of the model parameters from experimental data is computationally too intensive. In this manuscript, we evaluate adjoint sensitivity analysis for parameter estimation in large scale biochemical reaction networks. We present the approach for time-discrete measurement and compare it to state-of-the-art methods used in systems and computational biology. Our comparison reveals a significantly improved computational efficiency and a superior scalability of adjoint sensitivity analysis. The computational complexity is effectively independent of the number of parameters, enabling the analysis of large- and genome-scale models. Our study of a comprehensive kinetic model of ErbB signaling shows that parameter estimation using adjoint sensitivity analysis requires a fraction of the computation time of established methods. The proposed method will facilitate mechanistic modeling of genome-scale cellular processes, as required in the age of omics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.