Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28113926›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2017

Comparison Between Pre-Log and Post-Log Statistical Models in Ultra-Low-Dose CT Reconstruction.

Lin Fu, Tzu-Cheng Lee, Soo Mee Kim, Adam M Alessio, Paul E Kinahan, Zhiqian Chang, Ken Sauer, Mannudeep K Kalra, Bruno De Man

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Gradient Descent Provably Solves Nonlinear Tomographic Reconstruction.IEEE transactions on information theory · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Structurally-sensitive Multi-scale Deep Neural Network for Low-Dose CT Denoising.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Accuracy comparison of 4D computed tomography (4DCT) and 4D cone beam computed tomography (4DCBCT).International journal of medical physics, clinical engineering and radiation oncology · 2017
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lin Fu
Tzu-Cheng Lee
Soo Mee Kim
Adam M Alessio
Paul E Kinahan
Zhiqian Chang
Ken Sauer
Mannudeep K Kalra
Bruno De Man

Funding

Enabling Ultra Low Dose PET/CT ImagingR01CA160253 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KINAHAN, PAUL E. · 2011 to 2015
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA160253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray detectors in clinical computed tomography (CT) usually operate in current-integrating mode. Their complicated signal statistics often lead to intractable likelihood functions for practical use in model-based image reconstruction (MBIR). It is therefore desirable to design simplified statistical models without losing the essential factors. Depending on whether the CT transmission data are logarithmically transformed, pre-log and post-log models are two major categories of choices in CT MBIR. Both being approximations, it remains an open question whether one model can notably improve image quality over the other on real scanners. In this study, we develop and compare several pre-log and post-log MBIR algorithms under a unified framework. Their reconstruction accuracy based on simulation and clinical datasets are evaluated. The results show that pre-log MBIR can achieve notably better quantitative accuracy than post-log MBIR in ultra-low-dose CT, although in less extreme cases, post-log MBIR with handcrafted pre-processing remains a competitive alternative. Pre-log MBIR could play a growing role in emerging ultra-low-dose CT applications.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAdultAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID28113926
PMCPMC5424567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.