Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28113267›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence2017

Selective Transfer Machine for Personalized Facial Expression Analysis.

Wen-Sheng Chu, Fernando De la Torre, Jeffrey F Cohn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Crossing Domains for AU Coding: Perspectives, Approaches, and Measures.IEEE transactions on biometrics, behavior, and identity science · 2020
    Article
  13. Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements.Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society · 2019
    Review
  14. Cross-domain AU Detection: Domains, Learning Approaches, and Measures.Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition. IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. FACSCaps: Pose-Independent Facial Action Coding with Capsules.Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Workshops · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Automatic Action Unit Detection in Infants Using Convolutional Neural Network.International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops : [proceedings]. ACII (Conference) · 2017
    Article
  19. A Branch-and-Bound Framework for Unsupervised Common Event Discovery.International journal of computer vision · 2017
    Article
  20. Sayette Group Formation Task (GFT) Spontaneous Facial Expression Database.Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition. IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wen-Sheng Chu
Fernando De la Torre
Jeffrey F Cohn

Funding

Automatic Multimodal Affect Detection for Research and Clinical Use R01MH096951 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COHN, JEFFREY F · 2012 to 2021
$5.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatic facial action unit (AU) and expression detection from videos is a long-standing problem. The problem is challenging in part because classifiers must generalize to previously unknown subjects that differ markedly in behavior and facial morphology (e.g., heavy versus delicate brows, smooth versus deeply etched wrinkles) from those on which the classifiers are trained. While some progress has been achieved through improvements in choices of features and classifiers, the challenge occasioned by individual differences among people remains. Person-specific classifiers would be a possible solution but for a paucity of training data. Sufficient training data for person-specific classifiers typically is unavailable. This paper addresses the problem of how to personalize a generic classifier without additional labels from the test subject. We propose a transductive learning method, which we refer to as a Selective Transfer Machine (STM), to personalize a generic classifier by attenuating person-specific mismatches. STM achieves this effect by simultaneously learning a classifier and re-weighting the training samples that are most relevant to the test subject. We compared STM to both generic classifiers and cross-domain learning methods on four benchmarks: CK+ [44], GEMEP-FERA [67], RUFACS [4] and GFT [57]. STM outperformed generic classifiers in all.

Identifiers

PMID28113267
PMCPMC5400741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.