Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28113135›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2017

How close are we to complete annotation of metabolomes?

Mark R Viant, Irwin J Kurland, Martin R Jones, Warwick B Dunn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 157 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Metabolic Profile ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. DietaryAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Modern Analytical Techniques in Epilepsy Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark R ViantSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Phenome Centre Birmingham, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. Electronic address: m.viant@bham.ac.uk.
Irwin J KurlandAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Martin R JonesSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Warwick B DunnSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Phenome Centre Birmingham, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.

Funding

Stable Isotope and Metabolomics CoreP60DK020541 · NIDDK · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI PESSIN, JEFFREY E. · 1986 to 2014
$29.8M
Translational Research CoreP30DK020541 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI STREAMSON C CHUA · 2015 to 2026
$27.7M
Medical Research Council MR/M009157/1NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020541NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK020541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The metabolome describes the full complement of the tens to hundreds of thousands of low molecular weight metabolites present within a biological system. Identification of the metabolome is critical for discovering the maximum amount of biochemical knowledge from metabolomics datasets. Yet no exhaustive experimental characterisation of any organismal metabolome has been reported to date, dramatically contrasting with the genome sequencing of thousands of plants, animals and microbes. Here, we review the status of metabolome annotation and describe advances in the analytical methodologies being applied. In part through new international coordination, we conclude that we are now entering a new era of metabolome annotation.

Indexed as

Data CurationMetabolomeAnimalsBacteriaChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalMetabolomicsPlants

Identifiers

PMID28113135
PMCPMC5337156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.