Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28112810›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology2017

Perceived Criticism in the Treatment of a High-Risk Adolescent.

Jill M Hooley, David J Miklowitz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05427123 (A Collaborative Treatment Network for Youth With or at High Risk for Bipolar Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05427123 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Collaborative Treatment Network for Youth With or at High Risk for Bipolar Disorder

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2022 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsBipolar Disorder, Bipolar I Disorder, Bipolar II Disorder, Other Specified Bipolar and Related DisorderArmsMedication or psychosocial treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jill M HooleyHarvard University.
David J MiklowitzUniversity of California at Los Angeles.

Funding

1/2-Early Intervention for Youth at Risk for Bipolar DisorderR01MH093676 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MIKLOWITZ, DAVID JAY · 2012 to 2016
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceived criticism (PC) is a construct that plays a key role in family relationships of persons with psychiatric disorders. It can be assessed in a brief and simple way using the Perceived Criticism Measure. PC ratings made by patients about their caregivers predict adverse clinical outcomes including increases in symptoms and relapse across a broad range of psychiatric diagnoses. Although research supports the concurrent and predictive validity of PC, the measure is not widely used in clinical practice. Here, we describe the construct of PC and review evidence supporting its clinical utility. We then illustrate how criticism and perceptions of criticism can be addressed in a clinical context, describing a family focused treatment approach used with a depressed adolescent at high risk for bipolar disorder.

Indexed as

Parent-Child RelationsSocial PerceptionAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAnxiety DisordersDepressive DisorderFamily TherapyHumansMaleadolescencecriticism, mood disordersexpressed emotionfamiliestreatment

Identifiers

PMID28112810
PMCPMC6028943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.