Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28112553›Full record

ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2017

Development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate infection control in oral radiology.

Eliana D da Costa, Camila Pinelli, Elaine P da Silva Tagliaferro, José E Corrente, Glaucia M B Ambrosano

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eliana D da Costa1 Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Camila Pinelli2 Department of Social Dentistry, Araraquara School of Dentistry, Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Araraquara, Brazil.
Elaine P da Silva Tagliaferro2 Department of Social Dentistry, Araraquara School of Dentistry, Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Araraquara, Brazil.
José E Corrente3 Department of Biostatistics, Bioscience Institute, Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Glaucia M B Ambrosano4 Department of Community Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo create and validate a questionnaire to evaluate infection control in oral radiology.

methodsThe questionnaire was developed after review of the literature, which included published articles and the biosafety protocols available from healthcare agencies. The initial version of the questionnaire was composed of 14 multiple choice questions and was divided into 3 domains on handwashing, disinfection/protection of surfaces and disinfectant used. Content validity was assessed by two expert committees, which reviewed the content and scope of the questionnaire and the relevance of each item, respectively. Reliability was evaluated using test-retest and internal consistency methods with 115 undergraduate dentistry students. Construct validity was assessed using the known-groups technique and factor analysis. The known-groups technique involved 641 undergraduate dentistry students, 20 PhD students and 15 oral radiology professors. In the factor analysis, 3 radiology technicians also participated in addition to the 641 undergraduates, 20 PhD students and 15 oral radiology professors.

resultsThe content validity results were found to be satisfactory to excellent for the ordinal variables (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.722-1.000) and good to great for the yes/no questions (kappa = 0.662-0.913) in terms of reliability and good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88). After a factor analysis, some questions were excluded, and the questions were grouped into new domains. Significant differences were observed between answers from different groups. The final version of the questionnaire was composed of nine domains.

conclusionsThe questionnaire created was found to exhibit good psychometric properties for assessing infection control in oral radiology.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesHumansInfection Control, DentalPsychometricsRadiography, DentalReproducibility of ResultsUniversal Precautionsinfection controlquestionnairesradiologyreproducibilitytest validity

Identifiers

PMID28112553
PMCPMC5595002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.