Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28112455›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2017

Clinical impact of intraoperative CCEP monitoring in evaluating the dorsal language white matter pathway.

Yukihiro Yamao, Kengo Suzuki, Takeharu Kunieda, Riki Matsumoto, Yoshiki Arakawa, Takuro Nakae, Sei Nishida, Rika Inano, Sumiya Shibata, Akihiro Shimotake and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07789938 (Intraoperative Monitoring of Motor, Visual and Cortico-cortical Evoked Potentials in Brain Tumor Surgery Under General Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07789938 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

Intraoperative Monitoring of Motor, Visual and Cortico-cortical Evoked Potentials in Brain Tumor Surgery Under General Anesthesia: Prospective Cohort Studies

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2027 to 2029Enrolled166ConditionsIntraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring, Malignant Brain Tumors, Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring, Cortico-cortical Evoked Potential MonitoringArmsIntraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, no Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation evokes two distinct cortical responses via differential white matter activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Functional Approaches to the Surgery of Brain Gliomas.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yukihiro YamaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kengo SuzukiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Takeharu KuniedaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Riki MatsumotoDepartment of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshiki ArakawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Takuro NakaeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Sei NishidaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Rika InanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Sumiya ShibataDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Akihiro ShimotakeDepartment of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Takayuki KikuchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Nobukatsu SawamotoDepartment of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Nobuhiro MikuniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Akio IkedaDepartment of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders and Physiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hidenao FukuyamaHuman Brain Research Center, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Susumu MiyamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPSapporo Medical University · JPEhime University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to preserve postoperative language function, we recently proposed a new intraoperative method to monitor the integrity of the dorsal language pathway (arcuate fasciculus; AF) using cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs). Based on further investigations (20 patients, 21 CCEP investigations), including patients who were not suitable for awake surgery (five CCEP investigations) or those without preoperative neuroimaging data (eight CCEP investigations including four with untraceable tractography due to brain edema), we attempted to clarify the clinical impact of this new intraoperative method. We monitored the integrity of AF by stimulating the anterior perisylvian language area (AL) by recording CCEPs from the posterior perisylvian language area (PL) consecutively during both general anesthesia and awake condition. After tumor resection, single-pulse electrical stimuli were also applied to the floor of the removal cavity to record subcortico-cortical evoked potentials (SCEPs) at AL and PL in 12 patients (12 SCEP investigations). We demonstrated that (1) intraoperative dorsal language network monitoring was feasible even when patients were not suitable for awake surgery or without preoperative neuroimaging studies, (2) CCEP is a dynamic marker of functional connectivity or integrity of AF, and CCEP N1 amplitude could even become larger after reduction of brain edema, (3) a 50% CCEP N1 amplitude decline might be a cut-off value to prevent permanent language dysfunction due to impairment of AF, (4) a correspondence (<2.0 ms difference) of N1 onset latencies between CCEP and the sum of SCEPs indicates close proximity of the subcortical stimulus site to AF (<3.0 mm). Hum Brain Mapp 38:1977-1991, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Brain MappingLanguageAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsCerebral CortexElectric StimulationElectrocorticographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOxygenOxygenawake craniotomycortico-cortical evoked potentialdorsal language pathwayelectrical stimulationsubcortico-cortical evoked potential

Identifiers

PMID28112455
PMCPMC6866855
OpenAlexW2579929272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.