Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28112422›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2017

Efficacy of olanzapine for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis.

Ting Yang, Qianxin Liu, Min Lu, Lingyue Ma, Ying Zhou, Yimin Cui

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Benefits of Olanzapine in Palliating Symptoms.Current treatment options in oncology · 2020
    Review
  12. Olanzapine: Sancho Panza for clinicians who care for patients with advanced cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Olanzapine for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children and adolescents: a multi-center, feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ting YangDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, 6 Dahongluochang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Qianxin LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, 6 Dahongluochang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Min LuDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, 6 Dahongluochang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Lingyue MaDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, 6 Dahongluochang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Ying ZhouDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, 6 Dahongluochang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Yimin CuiDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First Hospital, 6 Dahongluochang Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Peking University First Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

methodsThe literature was searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of olanzapine for the prophylaxis of CINV using PubMed, Embase, Central, as well as clinicaltrials.gov for unpublished studies. The endpoints of the study were the number of patients who achieved a complete response (CR; no emesis and no rescue) and no nausea in the acute, delayed and overall phases. Two authors independently selected studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. The included RCTs were analysed using RevMan 5.3 provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.

resultsTen RCTs were identified for the meta-analysis. Compared with other antiemetic agents, olanzapine significantly improved the CR in the delayed and overall phases, but did not enhance the CR in the acute phase. For the control of CINV, olanzapine was better than and comparable with aprepitant in the acute phase and delayed phase, respectively. Compared with placebo, treatment with 5 mg and 10 mg olanzapine exhibited similar efficacy in terms of the CR in the delayed and overall phases.

conclusionsOlanzapine is an excellent alternative for the prophylaxis of CINV. Olanzapine 5 mg per day should be recommended as the initial dose because of equivalent efficacy to a 10 mg dose but a lower potential risk of side effects. Further studies are needed to explore the optimal combination of medicines.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsAprepitantBenzodiazepinesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansMorpholinesNauseaNeoplasmsOlanzapineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeVomitingAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsAprepitantBenzodiazepinesMorpholinesOlanzapinechemotherapy-induced nausea and vomitingmeta-analysisolanzapineprophylaxisrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID28112422
PMCPMC5465345
OpenAlexW2582351617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.