ArticleMolecular bioSystems2017
Inference of cancer mechanisms through computational systems analysis.
Article in Molecular bioSystems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics in Pediatric Health and Disease.Metabolites · 2026Review
- Perspective: Dimensions of the scientific method.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Dynamical systems approaches to personalized medicine.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2019Review
- Human Systems Biology and Metabolic Modelling: A Review-From Disease Metabolism to Precision Medicine.BioMed research international · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large amounts of metabolomics data have been accumulated to study metabolic alterations in cancer that allow cancer cells to synthesize molecular materials necessary for cell growth and proliferation. Although metabolic reprogramming in cancer was discovered almost a century ago, the underlying biochemical mechanisms are still unclear. We show that metabolomics data can be used to infer likely biochemical mechanisms associated with cancer. The proposed inference method is data-driven and quite generic; its efficacy is demonstrated by the analysis of changes in purine metabolism of human renal cell carcinoma. The method and results are essentially unbiased and tolerate noise in the data well. The proposed method correctly identified and accurately quantified primary enzymatic alterations in cancer, and these account for over 80% of the metabolic alterations in the investigated carcinoma. Interestingly, the two primary action sites are not the most sensitive reaction steps in purine metabolism, which implies that sensitivity analysis is not a valid approach for identifying cancer targets. The proposed method exhibits statistically high precision and robustness even for analyses of moderately incomplete metabolomics data. By permitting analyses of individual metabolic profiles, the method may become a tool of personalized precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.