ArticleScientific reports2017
Individuality manifests in the dynamic reconfiguration of large-scale brain networks during movie viewing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A conserved node degree-based backbone and flexible hub organization of brain connectome during naturalistic movie watching.NeuroImage · 2026Article
- Geometric learning of functional brain network on the correlation manifold.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Bayesian estimation of maximum entropy model for individualized energy landscape analysis of brain state dynamics.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Mapping the organization and dynamics of the posterior medial network during movie watching.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- State-Dependent Effective Connectivity in Resting-State fMRI.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Article
- Naturalistic Stimuli in Affective Neuroimaging: A Review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Review
- Inter-species cortical registration between macaques and humans using a functional network property under a spherical demons framework.PloS one · 2021Article
- Differential structure-function network coupling in the inattentive and combined types of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.PloS one · 2021Article
- Movies and narratives as naturalistic stimuli in neuroimaging.NeuroImage · 2021Review
- Educational fMRI: From the Lab to the Classroom.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Review
- Interpreting and Utilising Intersubject Variability in Brain Function.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2018Review
- Different shades of default mode disturbance in schizophrenia: Subnodal covariance estimation in structure and function.Human brain mapping · 2018Article
- Structural Brain Connectivity Constrains within-a-Day Variability of Direct Functional Connectivity.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuality, the uniqueness that distinguishes one person from another, may manifest as diverse rearrangements of functional connectivity during heterogeneous cognitive demands; yet, the neurobiological substrates of individuality, reflected in inter-individual variations of large-scale functional connectivity, have not been fully evidenced. Accordingly, we explored inter-individual variations of functional connectivity dynamics, subnetwork patterns and modular architecture while subjects watched identical video clips designed to induce different arousal levels. How inter-individual variations are manifested in the functional brain networks was examined with respect to four contrasting divisions: edges within the anterior versus posterior part of the brain, edges with versus without corresponding anatomically-defined structural pathways, inter- versus intra-module connections, and rich club edge types. Inter-subject variation in dynamic functional connectivity occurred to a greater degree within edges localized to anterior rather than posterior brain regions, without adhering to structural connectivity, between modules as opposed to within modules, and in weak-tie local edges rather than strong-tie rich-club edges. Arousal level significantly modulates inter-subject variability in functional connectivity, edge patterns, and modularity, and particularly enhances the synchrony of rich-club edges. These results imply that individuality resides in the dynamic reconfiguration of large-scale brain networks in response to a stream of cognitive demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.