Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28111765›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics2017

Potential drug-drug and drug-disease interactions in well-functioning community-dwelling older adults.

J T Hanlon, S Perera, A B Newman, J M Thorpe, J M Donohue, E M Simonsick, R I Shorr, D C Bauer, Z A Marcum, Health ABC Study

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J T HanlonDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
S PereraDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
A B NewmanDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J M ThorpeDepartment of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J M DonohueDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
E M SimonsickIntramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, USA.
R I ShorrGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Malcolm Randall Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, FL, USA.
D C BauerUniversity of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Z A MarcumDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Health ABC Study
University of Pittsburgh · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USNational Institute on Aging · US

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Caterina Rosano · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
Pitt Integrated Clinical and Geroscience Research Training ProgramT32AG021885 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Aditi U Gurkar · 2003 to 2026
$6.7M
Peripheral Nerve Function Decline in an Aged CohortR01AG028050 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STROTMEYER, ELSA S. · 2007 to 2015
$3.5M
End of Life in the Very OldR01NR012459 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ALBERT, STEVEN M, LUNNEY, JUNE R · 2011 to 2015
$2.7M
Improving Outcomes of UTI in LTC Facilities: The IOU StudyR18HS023779 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI NACE, DAVID A. · 2015 to 2017
$1.4M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS023779NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827NIA NIH HHS R01 AG028050NIA NIH HHS T32 AG021885NINR NIH HHS R01 NR012459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND

objectiveThere are few studies examining both drug-drug and drug-disease interactions in older adults. Therefore, the objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of potential drug-drug and drug-disease interactions and associated factors in community-dwelling older adults.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included 3055 adults aged 70-79 without mobility limitations at their baseline visit in the Health Aging and Body Composition Study conducted in the communities of Pittsburgh PA and Memphis TN, USA. The outcome factors were potential drug-drug and drug-disease interactions as per the application of explicit criteria drawn from a number of sources to self-reported prescription and non-prescription medication use.

resultsOver one-third of participants had at least one type of interaction. Approximately one quarter (25·1%) had evidence of had one or more drug-drug interactions. Nearly 10·7% of the participants had a drug-drug interaction that involved a non-prescription medication. % The most common drug-drug interaction was non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) affecting antihypertensives. Additionally, 16·0% had a potential drug-disease interaction with 3·7% participants having one involving non-prescription medications. The most common drug-disease interaction was aspirin/NSAID use in those with history of peptic ulcer disease without gastroprotection. Over one-third (34·0%) had at least one type of drug interaction. Each prescription medication increased the odds of having at least one type of drug interaction by 35-40% [drug-drug interaction adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1·35, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1·27-1·42; drug-disease interaction AOR = 1·30; CI = 1·21-1·40; and both AOR = 1·45; CI = 1·34-1·57]. A prior hospitalization increased the odds of having at least one type of drug interaction by 49-84% compared with those not hospitalized (drug-drug interaction AOR = 1·49, 95% CI = 1·11-2·01; drug-disease interaction AOR = 1·69, CI = 1·15-2·49; and both AOR = 1·84, CI = 1·20-2·84). WHAT IS NEW AND

conclusionDrug interactions are common among community-dwelling older adults and are associated with the number of medications and hospitalization in the previous year. Longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the impact of drug interactions on health-related outcomes.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsAgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidalageddrug interactiondrug utilization

Identifiers

PMID28111765
PMCPMC5336465
OpenAlexW2582182712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.