Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28111629›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2017

Adolescence and Drug Use Vulnerability: Findings from Neuroimaging.

Lindsay M Squeglia, Anita Cservenka

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Co-design of digital public health substance use resources: A collaboration between young people and experts.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Addiction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Predictors of Substance Use Initiation by Early Adolescence.The American journal of psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lindsay M SquegliaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Addiction Sciences Division, Medical University of South Carolina, 67 President Street, MSC 861, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Anita CservenkaSchool of Psychological Science, Oregon State University, 2950 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USOregon State University · US

Funding

Clinical Scientists Training Program in Addictions at MUSCK12DA031794 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Kevin M. Gray, AIMEE L MCRAE-CLARK · 2013 to 2026
$7.2M
Neuroscience-informed Treatment Development for Adolescent Alcohol Use DisordersK23AA025399 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SQUEGLIA, LINDSAY · 2016 to 2020
$1.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA025399NIDA NIH HHS K12 DA031794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is a period of vulnerability for developing substance use disorder. Recent neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies have elucidated underlying neural vulnerabilities that contribute to initiation of substance use during adolescence. Findings suggest poorer performance on tasks of inhibition and working memory, smaller brain volumes in reward and cognitive control regions, less brain activation during executive functioning tasks, and heightened reward responsivity are predictive of youth initiating substance use during adolescence. In youth who are family history positive (FHP) for substance use disorder, poorer executive functioning, smaller volume of limbic brain regions (e.g., amygdala), sex-specific patterns of hippocampal volume, and a positive association between nucleus accumbens volume and family history density have been reported. Further, reduced white matter integrity, altered brain response during inhibitory control, including both greater and less frontal lobe response, blunted emotional processing, and weaker neural connectivity have also been found in FHP youth. Thus, there is significant overlap among the neural precursors shown to be predictive of alcohol and substance use initiation during adolescence and those that distinguish FHP from youth without a family history of substance use disorder, suggesting common targets for prevention and intervention. Understanding these predictive factors helps identify at-risk youth for prevention efforts, as well as create interventions targeting cognitive weaknesses or brain regions involved in substance use initiation.

Identifiers

PMID28111629
PMCPMC5241101
OpenAlexW2569624917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.