Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28111627›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2017

Beyond Sensation Seeking: A Conceptual Framework for Individual Differences in Psychostimulant Drug Effects in Healthy Humans.

Tara L White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dignity neuroscience: universal rights are rooted in human brain science.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tara L WhiteCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, School of Public Health, and Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI. USA.
Brown University · US

Funding

Virology CoreP01AA019072 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BECKER, SARA · 2010 to 2024
$19.7M
Imaging Individual Differences In Amphetamine EffectsR01DA020725 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WHITE, TARA L · 2007 to 2010
$1.4M
Imaging Individual Differences in Methamphetamine EffectsR21DA029189 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WHITE, TARA L · 2011 to 2013
$437k
NIAAA NIH HHS P01 AA019072NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020725NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA029189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychostimulant addiction is an important, relapsing condition for which there is no effective pharmacological treatment. Countering this problem requires an understanding of the specific risk factors that predispose individuals to initial misuse of these drugs. Healthy individuals display marked individual differences in emotional, behavioral and brain responses to low and moderate doses of stimulant drugs. These between-person differences have been most often studied using personality measures of sensation seeking. However, a growing body of work in healthy adults indicates potentially unique sources of variance in these responses that are related to four dissociable personality domains: extraversion, fearlessness, impulsivity and absorption. These four domains are empirically dissociable and can serve as endophenotypic markers of dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin function in healthy individuals. The relationship between normal variation in these traits and the pharmacological effects of these drugs is here proposed as a framework for better understanding the specific sources of between-person variation in stimulant drug effects on mood, behavior and brain responses in healthy humans.

Identifiers

PMID28111627
PMCPMC5244826
OpenAlexW2551155137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.