Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28111567›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2016

Resource Recovery from Wastewater by Biological Technologies: Opportunities, Challenges, and Prospects.

Daniel Puyol, Damien J Batstone, Tim Hülsen, Sergi Astals, Miriam Peces, Jens O Krömer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Precious Metal Recovery from Wastewater Using Bio-Based Techniques.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Closing the Nutrient Loop-The New Approaches to Recovering Biomass Minerals during the Biorefinery Processes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel PuyolGroup of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, School of Experimental Sciences and Technology, King Juan Carlos University Mostoles, Spain.
Damien J BatstoneAdvanced Water Management Centre, University of Queensland, BrisbaneQLD, Australia; CRC for Water Sensitive Cities, ClaytonVIC, Australia.
Tim HülsenAdvanced Water Management Centre, University of Queensland, BrisbaneQLD, Australia; CRC for Water Sensitive Cities, ClaytonVIC, Australia.
Sergi AstalsAdvanced Water Management Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD, Australia.
Miriam PecesCentre for Solid Waste Bioprocessing, School of Civil Engineering, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD, Australia.
Jens O KrömerAdvanced Water Management Centre, University of Queensland, BrisbaneQLD, Australia; Centre for Microbial Electrochemical Systems, University of Queensland, BrisbaneQLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limits in resource availability are driving a change in current societal production systems, changing the focus from residues treatment, such as wastewater treatment, toward resource recovery. Biotechnological processes offer an economic and versatile way to concentrate and transform resources from waste/wastewater into valuable products, which is a prerequisite for the technological development of a cradle-to-cradle bio-based economy. This review identifies emerging technologies that enable resource recovery across the wastewater treatment cycle. As such, bioenergy in the form of biohydrogen (by photo and dark fermentation processes) and biogas (during anaerobic digestion processes) have been classic targets, whereby, direct transformation of lipidic biomass into biodiesel also gained attention. This concept is similar to previous biofuel concepts, but more sustainable, as third generation biofuels and other resources can be produced from waste biomass. The production of high value biopolymers (e.g., for bioplastics manufacturing) from organic acids, hydrogen, and methane is another option for carbon recovery. The recovery of carbon and nutrients can be achieved by organic fertilizer production, or single cell protein generation (depending on the source) which may be utilized as feed, feed additives, next generation fertilizers, or even as probiotics. Additionlly, chemical oxidation-reduction and bioelectrochemical systems can recover inorganics or synthesize organic products beyond the natural microbial metabolism. Anticipating the next generation of wastewater treatment plants driven by biological recovery technologies, this review is focused on the generation and re-synthesis of energetic resources and key resources to be recycled as raw materials in a cradle-to-cradle economy concept.

Indexed as

biological processescircular economycradle-to-cradleresource recoverywastewater treatmentwater-energy nexus

Identifiers

PMID28111567
PMCPMC5216025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.