Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28111549›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2016

Anti-angiogenic Therapy in Cancer: Downsides and New Pivots for Precision Medicine.

Gabriella Lupo, Nunzia Caporarello, Melania Olivieri, Martina Cristaldi, Carla Motta, Vincenzo Bramanti, Roberto Avola, Mario Salmeri, Ferdinando Nicoletti, Carmelina D Anfuso

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Endothelial metabolic zonation in the vascular network: a spatiotemporal blueprint for angiogenesis.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lumbrokinase Extracted fromBiomolecules · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gabriella LupoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania Catania, Italy.
Nunzia CaporarelloDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania Catania, Italy.
Melania OlivieriDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania Catania, Italy.
Martina CristaldiDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania Catania, Italy.
Carla MottaDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania Catania, Italy.
Vincenzo BramantiDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania Catania, Italy.
Roberto AvolaDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania Catania, Italy.
Mario SalmeriDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania Catania, Italy.
Ferdinando NicolettiDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania Catania, Italy.
Carmelina D AnfusoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catania Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary solid tumors originate close to pre-existing tissue vasculature, initially growing along such tissue blood vessels, and this phenomenon is important for the metastatic potential which frequently occurs in highly vascularized tissues. Unfortunately, preclinic and clinic anti-angiogenic approaches have not been very successful, and multiple factors have been found to contribute to toxicity and tumor resistance. Moreover, tumors can highlight intrinsic or acquired resistances, or show adaptation to the VEGF-targeted therapies. Furthermore, different mechanisms of vascularization, activation of alternative signaling pathways, and increased tumor aggressiveness make this context even more complex. On the other hand, it has to be considered that the transitional restoration of normal, not fenestrated, microvessels allows the drug to reach the tumor and act with the maximum efficiency. However, these effects are time-limited and different, depending on the various types of cancer, and clearly define a specific "normalization window." So, new horizons in the therapeutic approaches consist on the treatment of the tumor with pro- (instead of anti-) angiogenic therapies, which could strengthen a network of well-structured blood vessels that facilitate the transport of the drug.

Indexed as

anti-angiogenic therapyhypoxia detectionmicrovascular architecturepericytestumor angiogenesistumor endothelial cells (TECs)vascular normalization

Identifiers

PMID28111549
PMCPMC5216034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.