ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2016
Cyberinfrastructure for Open Science at the Montreal Neurological Institute.
Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consent Codes: Maintaining Consent in an Ever-expanding Open Science Ecosystem.Neuroinformatics · 2023Article
- The efficacy and safety of Jin's three-needle therapy vs. placebo acupuncture on anxiety symptoms in patients with post-stroke anxiety: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- The LORIS MyeliNeuroGene rare disease database for natural history studies and clinical trial readiness.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Article
- Bridging the Brain and Data Sciences.Big data · 2021Article
- A hitchhiker's guide to working with large, open-source neuroimaging datasets.Nature human behaviour · 2021Article
- Play the Pain: A Digital Strategy for Play-Oriented Research and Action.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Open science datasets from PREVENT-AD, a longitudinal cohort of pre-symptomatic Alzheimer's disease.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2021Article
- EEG-IP: an international infant EEG data integration platform for the study of risk and resilience in autism and related conditions.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020Article
- A Multicenter Preclinical MRI Study: Definition of Rat Brain Relaxometry Reference Maps.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2020Article
- Individual-patient prediction of meningioma malignancy and survival using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.NPJ digital medicine · 2020Article
- The Quebec Parkinson Network: A Researcher-Patient Matching Platform and Multimodal Biorepository.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2020Article
- Predicting age from cortical structure across the lifespan.The European journal of neuroscience · 2018Article
- Integration ofFrontiers in neuroinformatics · 2018Article
- Identifying the challenges in implementing open science [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].MNI open research · 2018Article
- Open Science Meets Stem Cells: A New Drug Discovery Approach for Neurodegenerative Disorders.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data sharing is becoming more of a requirement as technologies mature and as global research and communications diversify. As a result, researchers are looking for practical solutions, not only to enhance scientific collaborations, but also to acquire larger amounts of data, and to access specialized datasets. In many cases, the realities of data acquisition present a significant burden, therefore gaining access to public datasets allows for more robust analyses and broadly enriched data exploration. To answer this demand, the Montreal Neurological Institute has announced its commitment to Open Science, harnessing the power of making both clinical and research data available to the world (Owens, 2016a,b). As such, the LORIS and CBRAIN (Das et al., 2016) platforms have been tasked with the technical challenges specific to the institutional-level implementation of open data sharing, including: Comprehensive linking of multimodal data (phenotypic, clinical, neuroimaging, biobanking, and genomics, etc.)Secure database encryption, specifically designed for institutional and multi-project data sharing, ensuring subject confidentiality (using multi-tiered identifiers).Querying capabilities with multiple levels of single study and institutional permissions, allowing public data sharing for all consented and de-identified subject data.Configurable pipelines and flags to facilitate acquisition and analysis, as well as access to High Performance Computing clusters for rapid data processing and sharing of software tools.Robust Workflows and Quality Control mechanisms ensuring transparency and consistency in best practices.Long term storage (and web access) of data, reducing loss of institutional data assets.Enhanced web-based visualization of imaging, genomic, and phenotypic data, allowing for real-time viewing and manipulation of data from anywhere in the world.Numerous modules for data filtering, summary statistics, and personalized and configurable dashboards. Implementing the vision of Open Science at the Montreal Neurological Institute will be a concerted undertaking that seeks to facilitate data sharing for the global research community. Our goal is to utilize the years of experience in multi-site collaborative research infrastructure to implement the technical requirements to achieve this level of public data sharing in a practical yet robust manner, in support of accelerating scientific discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.