Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28111430›Full record

Trial reportCancer research and treatment2017

Incorporating Erlotinib or Irinotecan Plus Cisplatin into Chemoradiotherapy for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer According to EGFR Mutation Status.

Youngjoo Lee, Ji-Youn Han, Sung Ho Moon, Byung-Ho Nam, Kun Young Lim, Geon Kook Lee, Heung Tae Kim, Tak Yun, Hye Jin An, Jin Soo Lee

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Youngjoo LeeCenter for Lung Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Ji-Youn HanCenter for Lung Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Sung Ho MoonCenter for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Byung-Ho NamCenter for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Kun Young LimCenter for Lung Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Geon Kook LeeCenter for Lung Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Heung Tae KimCenter for Lung Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Tak YunCenter for Lung Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Hye Jin AnCenter for Lung Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Jin Soo LeeCenter for Lung Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
National Cancer Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConcurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard care for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients; however, a more effective regimen is needed to improve the outcome by better controlling occult metastases. We conducted two parallel randomized phase II studies to incorporate erlotinib or irinotecan-cisplatin (IP) into CCRT for stage III NSCLC depending on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with EGFR-mutant tumors were randomized to receive three cycles of erlotinib first and then either CCRT with erlotinib followed by erlotinib (arm A) or CCRT with IP only (arm B). Patients with EGFR unknown or wild-type tumors were randomized to receive either three cycles of IP before (arm C) or after CCRT with IP (arm D).

resultsSeventy-three patients were screened and the study was closed early because of slow accrual after 59 patients were randomized. Overall, there were seven patients in arm A, five in arm B, 22 in arm C, and 25 in arm D. The response rate was 71.4% and 80.0% for arm A and B, and 70.0% and 73.9% for arm C and D. The median overall survival (OS) was 39.3 months versus 31.2 months for arm A and B (p=0.442), and 16.3 months versus 25.3 months for arm C and D (p=0.050). Patients with sensitive EGFR mutations had significantly longer OS than EGFR-wild patients (74.8 months vs. 25.3 months, p=0.034). There were no unexpected toxicities.

conclusionCombined-modality treatment by molecular diagnostics is feasible in stage III NSCLC. EGFR-mutant patients appear to be a distinct subset with longer survival.

Indexed as

MutationAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCisplatinCombined Modality TherapyDNA Mutational AnalysisErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleHumansIrinotecanLung NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingCamptothecinCisplatinErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideIrinotecanChemoradiotherapyEGFR mutationEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitorNon-small-cell lung carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID28111430
PMCPMC5654157
OpenAlexW2570270526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.