Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28111150›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017

Target Displacements during Eye Blinks Trigger Automatic Recalibration of Gaze Direction.

Gerrit W Maus, Marianne Duyck, Matteo Lisi, Thérèse Collins, David Whitney, Patrick Cavanagh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Resolving visual motion through perceptual gaps.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gerrit W MausDivision of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 14 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637332, Singapore; Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Electronic address: maus@ntu.edu.sg.
Marianne DuyckLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, 45 Rue des Saints-Pères, 75006 Paris, France.
Matteo LisiLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, 45 Rue des Saints-Pères, 75006 Paris, France.
Thérèse CollinsLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, 45 Rue des Saints-Pères, 75006 Paris, France.
David WhitneyDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; Vision Science Program and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Patrick CavanaghLaboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, 45 Rue des Saints-Pères, 75006 Paris, France; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.

Funding

Neural mechanisms of perceptual localizationR01EY018216 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI WHITNEY, DAVID V · 2007 to 2015
$2.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye blinks cause disruptions to visual input and are accompanied by rotations of the eyeball [1]. Like every motor action, these eye movements are subject to noise and introduce instabilities in gaze direction across blinks [2]. Accumulating errors across repeated blinks would be debilitating for visual performance. Here, we show that the oculomotor system constantly recalibrates gaze direction during blinks to counteract gaze instability. Observers were instructed to fixate a visual target while gaze direction was recorded and blinks were detected in real time. With every spontaneous blink-while eyelids were closed-the target was displaced laterally by 0.5° (or 1.0°). Most observers reported being unaware of displacements during blinks. After adapting for ∼35 blinks, gaze positions after blinks showed significant biases toward the new target position. Automatic eye movements accompanied each blink, and an aftereffect persisted for a few blinks after target displacements were eliminated. No adaptive gaze shift occurred when blinks were simulated with shutter glasses at random time points or actively triggered by observers, or when target displacements were masked by a distracting stimulus. Visual signals during blinks are suppressed by inhibitory mechanisms [3-6], so that small changes across blinks are generally not noticed [7, 8]. Additionally, target displacements during blinks can trigger automatic gaze recalibration, similar to the well-known saccadic adaptation effect [9-11]. This novel mechanism might be specific to the maintenance of gaze direction across blinks or might depend on a more general oculomotor recalibration mechanism adapting gaze position during intrinsically generated disruptions to visual input.

Indexed as

BlinkingEye MovementsFixation, OcularSaccadesAdaptation, PhysiologicalAttentionHumansPhotic Stimulationadaptationeye blinkseye movementsoculomotor systemrecalibrationsuppression of displacementvisual stability

Identifiers

PMID28111150
PMCPMC5308877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.