Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28110804›Full record

ArticleDNA repair2017

Differential role of base excision repair proteins in mediating cisplatin cytotoxicity.

Akshada Sawant, Ashley M Floyd, Mohan Dangeti, Wen Lei, Robert W Sobol, Steve M Patrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA repair, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Pharmaceutics · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Identification and Characterization of Synthetic Viability with ERCC1 Deficiency in Response to Interstrand Crosslinks in Lung Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Akshada SawantDepartment of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, United States.
Ashley M FloydDepartment of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, United States.
Mohan DangetiDepartment of Biochemistry and Cancer Biology, University of Toledo - Health Science Campus, Toledo, OH 43614, United States.
Wen LeiDepartment of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, United States.
Robert W SobolDepartment of Oncologic Sciences, Molecular & Metabolic Oncology Program, Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama,1660 Springhill Avenue, Mobile, AL 36604, United States.
Steve M PatrickDepartment of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, United States. Electronic address: patricks@karmanos.org.
Wayne State University · USThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Toledo · USUSA Mitchell Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Novel approaches to enhance tumor cell cytotoxicity of alkylating agentsR01CA148629 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA · PI SOBOL, ROBERT W · 2010 to 2021
$3.4M
Novel Role of Base Excision Repair and Mismatch Repair in Cisplatin SensitivityR01GM088249 · NIGMS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PATRICK, STEVE M · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA148629NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) are covalent lesions formed by cisplatin. The mechanism for the processing and removal of ICLs by DNA repair proteins involves nucleotide excision repair (NER), homologous recombination (HR) and fanconi anemia (FA) pathways. In this report, we monitored the processing of a flanking uracil adjacent to a cisplatin ICL by the proteins involved in the base excision repair (BER) pathway. Using a combination of extracts, purified proteins, inhibitors, functional assays and cell culture studies, we determined the specific BER proteins required for processing a DNA substrate with a uracil adjacent to a cisplatin ICL. Uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) is the primary glycosylase responsible for the removal of uracils adjacent to cisplatin ICLs, whereas other uracil glycosylases can process uracils in the context of undamaged DNA. Repair of the uracil adjacent to cisplatin ICLs proceeds through the classical BER pathway, highlighting the importance of specific proteins in this redundant pathway. Removal of uracil is followed by the generation of an abasic site and subsequent cleavage by AP endonuclease 1 (APE1). Inhibition of either the repair or redox domain of APE1 gives rise to cisplatin resistance. Inhibition of the lyase domain of Polymerase β (Polβ) does not influence cisplatin cytotoxicity. In addition, lack of XRCC1 leads to increased DNA damage and results in increased cisplatin cytotoxicity. Our results indicate that BER activation at cisplatin ICLs influences crosslink repair and modulates cisplatin cytotoxicity via specific UNG, APE1 and Polβ polymerase functions.

Indexed as

DNA AdductsDNA RepairAnimalsCisplatinDNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) LyaseDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Polymerase betaHumansMiceSubstrate SpecificityUracilUracil-DNA GlycosidaseX-ray Repair Cross Complementing Protein 1APEX1 protein, humanCisplatincisplatin-DNA adductDNA AdductsDNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) LyaseDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Polymerase betaUracilUracil-DNA GlycosidaseX-ray Repair Cross Complementing Protein 1XRCC1 protein, humanXrcc1 protein, mouseBERCisplatinICLResistance

Identifiers

PMID28110804
PMCPMC5328804
OpenAlexW2575586677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.