Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28110564›Full record

Trial reportIntegrative cancer therapies2018

Recruitment to the "Breast-Activity and Healthy Eating After Diagnosis" (B-AHEAD) Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mary Pegington, Judith E Adams, Nigel J Bundred, Anna M Campbell, Anthony Howell, Sacha J Howell, Shaun Speed, Jane Wolstenholme, Michelle N Harvie

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Integrative cancer therapies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Body weight management in overweight and obese breast cancer survivors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Pegington1 University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Judith E Adams2 University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Nigel J Bundred1 University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Anna M Campbell4 Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
Anthony Howell1 University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sacha J Howell2 University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Shaun Speed2 University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jane Wolstenholme6 University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Michelle N Harvie1 University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.
University of Manchester · GBEdinburgh Napier University · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0407-12313Department of Health RP-PG-0608-10168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excess weight at breast cancer diagnosis and weight gain during treatment are linked to increased breast cancer specific and all-cause mortality. The Breast-Activity and Healthy Eating After Diagnosis (B-AHEAD) trial tested 2 weight loss diet and exercise programmes versus a control receiving standard written advice during adjuvant treatment. This article identifies differences in characteristics between patients recruited from the main trial site to those of the whole population from that site during the recruitment period and identifies barriers to recruitment. A total of 409 patients with operable breast cancer were recruited within 12 weeks of surgery. We compared demographic and treatment factors between women recruited from the main trial coordinating site (n = 300) to the whole breast cancer population in the center (n = 532). Uptake at the coordinating site was 42%, comparable to treatment trials in the unit (47%). Women recruited were younger (55.9 vs 61.2 years, P < .001), more likely to live in least deprived postcode areas (41.7% vs 31.6%, P = .004), and more likely to have screen-detected cancers (55.3% vs 48.7%, P = .026) than the whole breast cancer population. The good uptake highlights the interest in lifestyle change around the time of diagnosis, a challenging time in the patient pathway, and shows that recruitment at this time is feasible. Barriers to uptake among older women and women with a lower socioeconomic status should be understood and overcome in order to improve recruitment to future lifestyle intervention programs.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyExercisePatient SelectionBreast NeoplasmsDiet, ReducingFemaleHealthy LifestyleHumansLife StyleMiddle AgedOverweightbreast cancerdietexerciselifestyle interventionrecruitment

Identifiers

PMID28110564
PMCPMC5950951
OpenAlexW2581208553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.