Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28110410›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2017

Neurophysiological assessment of brain dysfunction in critically ill patients: an update.

Eric Azabou, Catherine Fischer, Jean Michel Guerit, Djillali Annane, François Mauguiere, Fréderic Lofaso, Tarek Sharshar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Post-cardiac arrest myoclonus and in ICU mortality: insights from the Parisian Registry of Cardiac Arrest (PROCAT).Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Seizures and Sepsis: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Diagnosing acute brain dysfunction due to sepsis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric AzabouDepartment of Physiology and Department of Critical Care Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Raymond Poincaré Hospital, INSERM U1173, University of Versailles Saint Quentin-En-Yvelines (UVSQ), 104 Boulevard Raymond Poincaré, Garches, 92380, Paris, France. eric.azabou@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9747-9972
Catherine FischerDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Neurological Hospital of Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), Brain Dynamics and Cognition Team (Dycog), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Jean Michel GueritDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, CHIREC, Hôpital Edith Cavell, 1180, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Djillali AnnaneDepartment of Physiology and Department of Critical Care Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Raymond Poincaré Hospital, INSERM U1173, University of Versailles Saint Quentin-En-Yvelines (UVSQ), 104 Boulevard Raymond Poincaré, Garches, 92380, Paris, France.
François MauguiereDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Neurological Hospital of Lyon, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), Brain Dynamics and Cognition Team (Dycog), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Fréderic LofasoDepartment of Physiology and Department of Critical Care Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Raymond Poincaré Hospital, INSERM U1173, University of Versailles Saint Quentin-En-Yvelines (UVSQ), 104 Boulevard Raymond Poincaré, Garches, 92380, Paris, France.
Tarek SharsharDepartment of Physiology and Department of Critical Care Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Raymond Poincaré Hospital, INSERM U1173, University of Versailles Saint Quentin-En-Yvelines (UVSQ), 104 Boulevard Raymond Poincaré, Garches, 92380, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier Interrégional Edith Cavell · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review was to provide up-to-date information about the usefulness of clinical neurophysiology testing in the management of critically ill patients. Evoked potentials (EPs) and electroencephalogram (EEG) are non-invasive clinical neurophysiology tools that allow an objective assessment of the central nervous system's function at the bedside in intensive care unit (ICU). These tests are quite useful in diagnosing cerebral complications, and establishing the vital and functional prognosis in ICU. EEG keeps a particularly privileged importance in detecting seizures phenomena such as subclinical seizures and non-convulsive status epilepticus. Quantitative EEG (QEEG) analysis techniques commonly called EEG Brain mapping can provide obvious topographic displays of digital EEG signals characteristics, showing the potential distribution over the entire scalp including filtering, frequency, and amplitude analysis and color mapping. Evidences of usefulness of QEEG for seizures detection in ICU are provided by several recent studies. Furthermore, beyond detection of epileptic phenomena, changes of some QEEG panels are early warning indicators of sedation level as well as brain damage or dysfunction in ICU. EPs offer the opportunity for assessing brainstem's functional integrity, as well as subcortical and cortical brain areas. A multimodal use, combining EEG and various modalities of EPs is recommended since this allows a more accurate functional exploration of the brain and helps caregivers to tailor therapeutic measures according to neurological worsening trends and to anticipate the prognosis in ICU.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessBrainBrain InjuriesEvoked PotentialsHumansIntensive Care UnitsNeurophysiologyClinical neurophysiologyDiagnosticEEGEvoked potentialsICUPrognostic

Identifiers

PMID28110410
OpenAlexW2575349349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.