Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28109962›Full record

Trial reportChest2017

Endothelial Permeability and Hemostasis in Septic Shock: Results From the ProCESS Trial.

Peter C Hou, Michael R Filbin, Henry Wang, Long Ngo, David T Huang, William C Aird, Donald M Yealy, Derek C Angus, John A Kellum, Nathan I Shapiro and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chest, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00510835 nacompletednot on this map

Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2008 to 2013Enrolled1,351ConditionsSepsis, Severe Sepsis, Septic ShockArmsEarly Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT), Protocolized Standard Care (PSC), Usual Care (UC)
NCT00793442 completednot on this map

Endothelial Cell Signaling and Microcirculatory Flow in Severe Sepsis

TypeobservationalSponsorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRan2008 to 2013Enrolled910ConditionsSepsis, Severe Sepsis, Septic ShockArmsBlood Collection and Assays
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diminished plasma levels of GPIb-Frontiers in medicine · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Chemical Adjustment of Fibrinolysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Plasminogen System in the Pathophysiology of Sepsis: Upcoming Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Peter C HouDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Michael R FilbinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Henry WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.
Long NgoDivision of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston, MA.
David T HuangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
William C AirdDivision of Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine and Center for Vascular Biology Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Donald M YealyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Derek C AngusDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
John A KellumDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Nathan I ShapiroDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Center for Vascular Biology Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA. Electronic address: nshapiro@bidmc.harvard.edu.
ProCESS Investigators(∗)
University of Pittsburgh · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCenter for Vascular Biology Research · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock (ProCESS)P50GM076659 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ANGUS, DEREK C · 2006 to 2012
$11.2M
Endothelial Cell Signaling and Microcirculatory Flow in Severe SepsisR01HL091757 · NHLBI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHAPIRO, NATHAN I · 2008 to 2011
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL091757NIA NIH HHS L30 AG022931NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM076659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe studied patients from the Protocolized Care in Early Septic Shock (ProCESS) trial to determine the effects of alternative resuscitation strategies on circulating markers of endothelial cell permeability and hemostasis and the association between biomarkers and mortality.

methodsThis was a prospective study of biomarkers of endothelial cell permeability (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 [sFLT-1], angiopoietin 2 [Ang-2]) and biomarkers of hemostasis (von Willebrand factor [vWF], thrombomodulin [TM], tissue plasminogen activator [tPA] in 605 of the 1,341 ProCESS participants in a derivation cohort and 305 participants in a validation cohort. Analyses assessed (1) the impact of varying resuscitation strategies on biomarker profiles and (2) the association of endothelial biomarkers with 60-day in-hospital mortality. The study was conducted in 31 US EDs in adult patients with septic shock. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three resuscitation strategies. Blood samples were collected at enrollment, at 6 h, and at 24 h.

resultsThere were 116 (19.2%) and 52 (17.0%) deaths in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. There was no significant association between treatment strategy and any biomarker levels. Permeability (Ang-2 and sFLT-1) and hemostasis (vWF, TM, tPA) biomarkers were higher and VEGF levels were lower in nonsurvivors (P < .05 for all). At baseline, sFLT-1 had the highest point estimate for mortality discrimination (derivation area under the curve [AUC], 0.74; validation, 0.70), similar to lactate (AUC, 0.74) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (AUC, 0.73). In an analysis including all time points and adjusted for age, presence of cancer, and Charlson comorbidity score, the adjusted AUC for sFLT-1 was 0.80.

conclusionsWe found no relationship between different resuscitation strategies and biomarker profiles in sepsis, but we did find that elevated levels of endothelial cell biomarkers of permeability and hemostasis were associated with increased mortality. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00510835 and NCT00793442; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Indexed as

BiomarkersShock, SepticAgedAngiopoietin-2Endothelial CellsFemaleHemostasisHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPermeabilityResuscitationStatistics as TopicThrombomodulinTissue Plasminogen ActivatorAngiopoietin-2BiomarkersFLT1 protein, humanThrombomodulinTissue Plasminogen ActivatorVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1von Willebrand Factorbiomarkersendotheliumhemostasispermeabilitysepsis

Identifiers

PMID28109962
PMCPMC5577354
OpenAlexW2575911653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.