Trial reportAmerican journal of preventive medicine2017
Increasing Use of a Healthy Food Incentive: A Waiting Room Intervention Among Low-Income Patients.
Trial report in American journal of preventive medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04986046 (Fruit and Vegetable Rx + Home Plate, a Multilevel Intervention to Improve Dietary Disparities Among Low-income Children and Families), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Fruit and Vegetable Rx + Home Plate, a Multilevel Intervention to Improve Dietary Disparities Among Low-income Children and Families
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Interventions Addressing Food Insecurity in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.Annals of family medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Multicomponent mHealth Intervention for Large, Sustained Change in Multiple Diet and Activity Risk Behaviors: The Make Better Choices 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Trial
- Cluster randomized controlled trial of a mobile market intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake among adults in lower-income communities in North Carolina.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018Trial
- Higher and Lower Intensity Outreach to Increase Enrollment in a Medicaid Food Is Medicine Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- The Veggie Vouchers intervention to promote SNAP fruit and vegetable incentive program use for families with food insecurity: a single arm feasibility study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2025Article
- Health and Economic Impacts of Implementing Produce Prescription Programs for Diabetes in the United States: A Microsimulation Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Mixed method evaluation of a clinic waiting room-based health education program in the Dominican Republic.Health education research · 2023Article
- A Community Partnership to Reduce Food Insecurity and Improve Patient-Reported Depression.NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery · 2023Article
- Healthcare-based food assistance programmes in the United States: a scoping review and typology.Journal of nutritional science · 2023Article
- Knowledge and attitudes of lower Michigan primary care physicians towards dietary interventions: A cross-sectional survey.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Article
- 'My coupons are like gold': experiences and perceived outcomes of low-income adults participating in the British Columbia Farmers' Market Nutrition Coupon Program.Public health nutrition · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of Social Needs Screening and Interventions in Clinical Settings on Utilization, Cost, and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Health equity · 2022Review
- Review
- Reducing food insecurity and improving fruit and vegetable intake through a nutrition incentive program in Michigan, USA.SSM - population health · 2021Article
- The impact of a produce prescription programme on healthy food purchasing and diabetes-related health outcomes.Public health nutrition · 2021Article
- Higher Fruit and Vegetable Intake Is Associated with Participation in the Double Up Food Bucks (DUFB) Program.Nutrients · 2021Article
- Identification of factors related to food insecurity and the implications for social determinants of health screenings.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDiet-related disease is disproportionately concentrated in low-income communities where fruit and vegetable consumption is far below guidelines. To address financial barriers, Double Up Food Bucks (DUFB)-a statewide healthy food incentive-matches Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) funds spent at farmers markets. However, incentive use is limited. This study examined the impact of a brief waiting room-based intervention about DUFB on program utilization and produce consumption. STUDY
designLongitudinal, repeated measures, quasi-experimental trial. SETTING/
participantsSNAP-enrolled adults at a health center in a low-income, racially and ethnically diverse area of Southeast Michigan.
interventionParticipants received a brief explanation of DUFB, written program materials, a map highlighting market locations and hours, and an initial $10 market voucher. DUFB use and produce consumption were measured through four surveys over 5 months (August 2014-January 2015).
main outcome measuresOutcome measures included DUFB use and fruit and vegetable consumption (analyses conducted in 2015-2016).
resultsA total of 302 eligible adults were identified, and 177 (59%) enrolled. One hundred twenty-seven (72%) completed all surveys. At baseline, 57% of participants reported shopping at a farmers market within the last year; 18% had previously used DUFB. By the end of the DUFB season, participants were significantly more likely to report DUFB use than at baseline (AOR=19.2, 95% CI=10.3, 35.5, p<0.001), with 69% of participants reporting use of DUFB at least once, and 34% reporting use of DUFB three or more times. Adjusted fruit and vegetable consumption increased from baseline by 0.65 servings/day (95% CI=0.37, 0.93, p<0.001) at 3 months, and remained 0.62 servings/day (95% CI=0.32, 0.92, p<0.001) higher than baseline 2 months post-DUFB season.
conclusionsA brief clinic-based intervention was associated with a nearly fourfold increase in uptake of a SNAP incentive program, as well as clinically and statistically significant increases in produce consumption. Results suggested sustained behavior change even once the financial incentive was no longer available. Providing information about healthy food incentives is a low-cost, easily implemented intervention that may increase produce consumption among low-income patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.