Trial reportJournal of translational medicine2017
Neuroregenerative potential of intravenous G-CSF and autologous peripheral blood stem cells in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study.
Trial report in Journal of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02983708 (Neuroregenerative Potential of Intravenous G-CSF and Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cells in Children With Cerebral Palsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neuroregenerative Potential of Intravenous G-CSF and Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cells in Children With Cerebral Palsy: a Randomized, Double-blind Cross-over Study
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of stem/stromal cell transplantation safety and efficacy in children diagnosed with cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of cell therapy modalities and outcomes in cerebral palsy.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Pooled it
- State of the Evidence Traffic Lights 2019: Systematic Review of Interventions for Preventing and Treating Children with Cerebral Palsy.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2020Pooled it
- Maintenance of the synergistic effects of cord blood cells and erythropoietin combination therapy after additional cord blood infusion in children with cerebral palsy: 1-year open-label extension study of randomized placebo-controlled trial.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Trial
- Potentiation of cord blood cell therapy with erythropoietin for children with CP: a 2 × 2 factorial randomized placebo-controlled trial.Stem cell research & therapy · 2020Trial
- Regenerative medicine approaches for children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review of clinical safety and effectiveness.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Stem Cell Therapy in Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy and Cerebral Palsy: a Bibliometric Analysis and New Strategy.Molecular neurobiology · 2024Review
- Clinical results of neurorestorative cell therapies and therapeutic indications according to cellular bio-proprieties.Regenerative therapy · 2023Review
- Are We Getting It Right? A Scoping Review of Outcomes Reported in Cell Therapy Clinical Studies for Cerebral Palsy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Microglia and Stem-Cell Mediated Neuroprotection after Neonatal Hypoxia-Ischemia.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Review
- Transcriptome and Translatome Regulation of Pathogenesis in Alzheimer's Disease Model Mice.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022Article
- Stem Cell Therapies for Cerebral Palsy and Autism Spectrum Disorder-A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Progress in clinical trials of stem cell therapy for cerebral palsy.Neural regeneration research · 2021Review
- Colony stimulating factors in the nervous system.Seminars in immunology · 2021Review
- Stem cell treatment and cerebral palsy: Systemic review and meta-analysis.World journal of stem cells · 2019Article
- Autologous cord blood in children with cerebral palsy: a review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- A New Approach to Cerebral Palsy Treatment: Discussion of the Effective Components of Umbilical Cord Blood and its Mechanisms of Action.Cell transplantation · 2019Review
- Emergent Prophylactic, Reparative and Restorative Brain Interventions for Infants Born Preterm With Cerebral Palsy.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Review
- Underregistration and Underreporting of Stem Cell Clinical Trials in Neurological Disorders.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe performed a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study to assess the neuroregenerative potential of intravenous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) followed by infusion of mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cells (mPBMCs) in children with cerebral palsy (CP).
methodsChildren with non-severe CP were enrolled in this study. G-CSF was administered for 5 days, then mPBMCs were collected by apheresis and cryopreserved. One month later (M1), recipients were randomized to receive either mPBMCs or a placebo infusion, and these treatment groups were switched at 7 months (M7) and observed for another 6 months (M13). We assessed the efficacy of treatment by evaluating neurodevelopmental tests, as well as by brain magnetic resonance imaging-diffusion tensor imaging (MRI-DTI) and
resultsFifty-seven patients aged 4.3 ± 1.9 (range 2-10) years and weighing 16.6 ± 4.9 (range 11.6-56.0) kg were enrolled in this study. The administration of G-CSF as well as the collection and reinfusion of mPBMCs were safe and tolerable. The yield of mPBMCs was comparable to that reported in studies of pediatric donors without CP and patients with nonhematologic diseases. 42.6% of the patients responded to the treatment with higher neurodevelopmental scores than would normally be expected. In addition, larger changes in neurodevelopment test scores were observed in the 1 month after G-CSF administration (M0-M1) than during the 6 months after reinfusion with mPBMCs or placebo (M1-M7 or M7-M13). Patients who received G-CSF followed by mPBMC infusion at 7 months (T7 group) demonstrated significantly more neurodevelopmental improvement than patients who received G-CSF followed by mPBMC infusion at 1 month (T1 group). In contrast to the results of neurodevelopment tests, the results of MRI-DTI at the end of this study showed greater improvement in the T1 group. Although we observed metabolic changes to the cerebellum, thalamus and cerebral cortex in the
conclusionsNeurodevelopmental improvement was seen in response to intravenous G-CSF followed by mPBMC reinfusion, particularly to the G-CSF alone even without mPBMC reinfusion. Further studies using a larger number of mPBMCs for the infusion which could be collected by repeated cycles of apheresis or using repeated cycles of G-CSF alone, are needed to clarify the effect of mPBMC reinfusion or G-CSF alone (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02983708. Registered 5 December, 2016, retrospectively registered).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.