ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017
Parameter estimation in large-scale systems biology models: a parallel and self-adaptive cooperative strategy.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gradient-based parameter optimization method to determine membrane ionic current composition in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Quantitative modelling of P-TEFb mediated CTD phosphorylation identifies local cooperativity.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Parameter estimation in a whole-brain network model of epilepsy: Comparison of parallel global optimization solvers.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Cell-specific models of hiPSC-CMs developed by the gradient-based parameter optimization method fitting two different action potential waveforms.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Reusable rule-based cell cycle model explains compartment-resolved dynamics of 16 observables in RPE-1 cells.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- A novel strategy for dynamic modeling of genome-scale interaction networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Systems biology of angiogenesis signaling: Computational models and omics.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2022Review
- A protocol for dynamic model calibration.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Multi-Level Computational Modeling of Anti-Cancer Dendritic Cell Vaccination Utilized to Select Molecular Targets for Therapy Optimization.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Towards a widespread adoption of metabolic modeling tools in biopharmaceutical industry: a process systems biology engineering perspective.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2020Review
- Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Quantification for Systems Biology Models.Current opinion in systems biology · 2019Article
- Metabolic kinetic modeling provides insight into complex biological questions, but hurdles remain.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2019Review
- Article
- Data reconciliation in the Quality-by-Design (QbD) implementation of pharmaceutical continuous tablet manufacturing.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2019Article
- Community-driven roadmap for integrated disease maps.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Benchmarking optimization methods for parameter estimation in large kinetic models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Article
- Comprehensive Review of Models and Methods for Inferences in Bio-Chemical Reaction Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- Emerging whole-cell modeling principles and methods.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2018Review
- A Review of Dynamic Modeling Approaches and Their Application in Computational Strain Optimization for Metabolic Engineering.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe development of large-scale kinetic models is one of the current key issues in computational systems biology and bioinformatics. Here we consider the problem of parameter estimation in nonlinear dynamic models. Global optimization methods can be used to solve this type of problems but the associated computational cost is very large. Moreover, many of these methods need the tuning of a number of adjustable search parameters, requiring a number of initial exploratory runs and therefore further increasing the computation times. Here we present a novel parallel method, self-adaptive cooperative enhanced scatter search (saCeSS), to accelerate the solution of this class of problems. The method is based on the scatter search optimization metaheuristic and incorporates several key new mechanisms: (i) asynchronous cooperation between parallel processes, (ii) coarse and fine-grained parallelism, and (iii) self-tuning strategies.
resultsThe performance and robustness of saCeSS is illustrated by solving a set of challenging parameter estimation problems, including medium and large-scale kinetic models of the bacterium E. coli, bakerés yeast S. cerevisiae, the vinegar fly D. melanogaster, Chinese Hamster Ovary cells, and a generic signal transduction network. The results consistently show that saCeSS is a robust and efficient method, allowing very significant reduction of computation times with respect to several previous state of the art methods (from days to minutes, in several cases) even when only a small number of processors is used.
conclusionsThe new parallel cooperative method presented here allows the solution of medium and large scale parameter estimation problems in reasonable computation times and with small hardware requirements. Further, the method includes self-tuning mechanisms which facilitate its use by non-experts. We believe that this new method can play a key role in the development of large-scale and even whole-cell dynamic models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.