Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28108977›Full record

ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2017

A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.

Nash Unsworth, Matthew K Robison

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Effort Mobilization and Lapses of Sustained Attention.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Trial
  5. Prenatal choline supplementation improves child sustained attention: A 7-year follow-up of a randomized controlled feeding trial.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Vulnerability of locus coeruleus connections to aging and Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Prolonged morning wake transitions associated with amyloid beta burden: A cross-sectional pilot study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nash UnsworthDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA. nashu@uoregon.edu.
Matthew K RobisonDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies examining individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) have suggested that low WMC individuals have particular deficits in attention control processes compared to high WMC individuals. In the current article we suggest that part of the WMC-attention control relation is due to variation in the functioning of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system (LC-NE). Specifically, we suggest that because of dysregulation of LC-NE functioning, the fronto-parietal control network for low WMC individuals is only weakly activated, resulting in greater default-mode network activity (and greater mind-wandering) for low WMC individuals compared to high WMC individuals. This results in disrupted attention control and overall more erratic performance (more lapses of attention) for low WMC individuals than for high WMC individuals. This framework is used to examine previous studies of individual differences in WMC and attention control, and new evidence is examined on the basis of predictions of the framework to pupillary responses as an indirect marker of LC-NE functioning.

Indexed as

IndividualityAttentionExecutive FunctionHumansLocus CoeruleusMemory, Short-TermNorepinephrineNorepinephrineAttention controlIndividual differencesWorking memory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.