Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28108815›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2017

Preoperative NLR for predicting survival rate after radical resection combined with adjuvant immunotherapy with CIK and postoperative chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

Yingchun Li, Chenyu Wang, Mengdan Xu, Cuicui Kong, Aibing Qu, Meng Zhang, Zhichao Zheng, Guirong Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy of ChemoimmunotherapyCurrent medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. CD4Cell death & disease · 2022
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yingchun LiBiological Treatment Research Center, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 86-110042, People's Republic of China.
Chenyu WangDepartment of information, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 86-110042, People's Republic of China.
Mengdan XuBiological Treatment Research Center, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 86-110042, People's Republic of China.
Cuicui KongBiological Treatment Research Center, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 86-110042, People's Republic of China.
Aibing QuBiological Treatment Research Center, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 86-110042, People's Republic of China.
Meng ZhangBiological Treatment Research Center, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 86-110042, People's Republic of China.
Zhichao ZhengDepartment of gastric surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 86-110042, People's Republic of China. dfzhengzhichao@126.com.
Guirong ZhangBiological Treatment Research Center, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44 Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 86-110042, People's Republic of China. zhang.lth@163.com.
China Medical University · CNLiaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of adjuvant immunotherapy with autologous cytokine-induced killer (CIK) for postoperative patients with gastric cancer and to investigate the impacts of the predictors on the efficacy of CIK immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND

methodsNinety-two gastric cancer patients who have accepted radical resection were enrolled. The CIK and control groups were established by 1:1 matching on their baseline. As prognosis indicators, preoperative blood cell counts, the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were analyzed, respectively. Statistical analyses were done using IBM SPSS Statistics ver.19.0.

resultsCIK treatment significantly prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) (p < 0.05) and there was a tendency of longer overall survival (OS) in the CIK group (p = 0.057). Preoperative NLR was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (p < 0.05). When patients were classified into low and high NLR groups using the cutoff value of 2.995, patients in the low NLR group had a better DFS (p < 0.05). Subset analysis showed that CIK immunotherapy significantly prolonged the DFS in the low NLR group (p = 0.017) but not in the high NLR group (p = 0.695) except that it did well clearly within 17 months. Compared to the low NLR group, lymphocyte decreased significantly, neutrophil increased steeply and white blood cell (WBC) elevated subsequently (p < 0.001in all cases) in the high NLR group.

conclusionAdjuvant immunotherapy with the CIK cells prolongs DFS in postoperative patients with gastric cancer and the preoperative NLR is an independent prognostic factor for DFS. Low NLR predicts significant benefits from the CIK immunotherapy while high NLR forebodes the requirement of more cycles of CIK treatment or other stronger immunotherapy to improve the survival rate of patients.

Indexed as

Combined Modality TherapyCytokine-Induced Killer CellsFemaleHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedNeutrophilsPreoperative CareRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsCIK immunotherapyDFSGastric cancerNLR

Identifiers

PMID28108815
PMCPMC11819014
OpenAlexW2576800055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.