Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28108811›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2017

Who Really Wins? Efficacy of a Croatian Youth Gambling Prevention Program.

Aleksandra Huic, Valentina Kranzelic, Dora Dodig Hundric, Neven Ricijas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preventive Gambling Programs for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Longitudinal Analysis of Gambling Predictors among Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aleksandra HuicDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Ivana Lucica 3, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia. aleksandra.huic@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7818-487X
Valentina KranzelicDepartment of Behavioral Disorders, Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Zagreb, Bornogajska cesta 83f, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Dora Dodig HundricDepartment of Behavioral Disorders, Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Zagreb, Bornogajska cesta 83f, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Neven RicijasDepartment of Behavioral Disorders, Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Zagreb, Bornogajska cesta 83f, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
University of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reports on the development and pilot evaluation of a Croatian school-based youth gambling prevention program "Who really wins?". The program is aimed at minimizing risk and enhancing protective factors related to youth gambling. A short-term evaluation of the program was conducted with a sample of 190 first and second year high-school students (67.6% boys, aged 14-17 years; average age 15.61). An experimental design with two groups (Training vs. No Training) and two measurement sessions (pre-test and post-test sessions) was used to evaluate change in problem gambling awareness, cognitive distortions, knowledge of the nature of random events as well as in social skills. Results showed significant changes in the post-test sessions, which can be attributed to changes in the Training group. We observed a decrease in risk factors, namely better knowledge about gambling and less gambling related cognitive distortions. Immediate effects on protective factors such as problem solving skills, refusal skills, and general self-efficacy were not observed. Findings also show program effects to be the same for both boys and girls, students from different types of schools, for those with different learning aptitudes, as well as for those at different risk levels with regard to their gambling, which speaks in favour of the program's universality. The program had no iatrogenic effects on behaviour change and shows promise as an effective tool for youth gambling prevention. Future research and a long-term evaluation are needed to determine whether the observed changes are also linked to behavioural change.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorCognitive Behavioral TherapyCroatiaFemaleGamblingHumansMaleProgram EvaluationSchool Health ServicesSchoolsSelf EfficacyStudentsAdolescentsEvaluationPrevention programProblem gamblingYouth gambling

Identifiers

PMID28108811
OpenAlexW2572606608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.