ReviewHNO2017
[Surgical indications and complications management in vestibular schwannoma].
Review in HNO, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas in Children-Volumetric Analysis and Clinical Outcome Assessment.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent surgical treatment concepts for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) require an interdisciplinary approach as well as recognition and mastering of complications.
objectiveThis paper provides an overview of indications, as well as possible options for function preservation and management of complications in the surgical resection of these tumors.
methodsUp-to-date treatment concepts and surgical indications were differentiated according to size and extent of tumors. The frequency of important complications was extracted from the literature. Technical options to avoid and correct complications were compiled from personal experience and review of the literature.
resultsComplications unrelated to cranial nerves are not infrequent, particularly in older patients. Small and medium-sized tumors that do not reach the fundus and cochlear fossa can be completely removed with good chances of hearing preservation. As long as these tumors do not grow, patients benefit from observation. Large tumors are overrepresented in surgical series compared to their prevalence. Postoperative facial nerve function correlates to tumor volume. Hearing preservation in these tumors is rare. Intraoperative electrophysiological techniques are valuable for attempted preservation of cranial nerve function. Persistent facial palsies can be remedied by dynamic and static interventions for facial rehabilitation.
conclusionMortality and morbidity associated with surgical treatment of VS are very acceptable. Surgical concepts should be custom-tailored to the individual patient in order to ensure high quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.