Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28108489›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2017

Processing of Egomotion-Consistent Optic Flow in the Rhesus Macaque Cortex.

Benoit R Cottereau, Andrew T Smith, Samy Rima, Denis Fize, Yseult Héjja-Brichard, Luc Renaud, Camille Lejards, Nathalie Vayssière, Yves Trotter, Jean-Baptiste Durand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intrinsic functional clustering of the macaque insular cortex.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Optic Flow Processing in Patients With Macular Degeneration.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Symmetry Processing in the Macaque Visual Cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022
    Article
  10. Retinal optic flow during natural locomotion.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Benoit R CottereauUniversité de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.
Andrew T SmithDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK.
Samy RimaUniversité de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.
Denis FizeLaboratoire d'Anthropologie Moléculaire et Imagerie de Synthèse, CNRS-Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Yseult Héjja-BrichardUniversité de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.
Luc RenaudCNRS, CE2F PRIM UMS3537, Marseille, France.
Camille LejardsUniversité de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.
Nathalie VayssièreUniversité de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.
Yves TrotterUniversité de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Baptiste DurandUniversité de Toulouse, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cortical network that processes visual cues to self-motion was characterized with functional magnetic resonance imaging in 3 awake behaving macaques. The experimental protocol was similar to previous human studies in which the responses to a single large optic flow patch were contrasted with responses to an array of 9 similar flow patches. This distinguishes cortical regions where neurons respond to flow in their receptive fields regardless of surrounding motion from those that are sensitive to whether the overall image arises from self-motion. In all 3 animals, significant selectivity for egomotion-consistent flow was found in several areas previously associated with optic flow processing, and notably dorsal middle superior temporal area, ventral intra-parietal area, and VPS. It was also seen in areas 7a (Opt), STPm, FEFsem, FEFsac and in a region of the cingulate sulcus that may be homologous with human area CSv. Selectivity for egomotion-compatible flow was never total but was particularly strong in VPS and putative macaque CSv. Direct comparison of results with the equivalent human studies reveals several commonalities but also some differences.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain MappingCerebral CortexCuesFemaleMacaca mulattaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotion PerceptionOptic FlowPhotic Stimulationegomotionheadingmonkey fMRIoptic flowvision

Identifiers

PMID28108489
PMCPMC5939222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.